ELECTRIC UNIVERSE

[killing raven sun]

Or darkness is not a perception but the inability to perceive

no, darkness is the perception of weak photons...

Perception (from the Latin perceptio) is the organization, identification, and interpretation of sensory information in order to represent and understand the presented information, or the environment.

Just as silence is impossible to perceive, John Cage was wrong.

no, silence is impossible to hear

Heat is the vibration of matter, or wave/particles in the electro magnetic spectrum, i.e. infrared.

no, that is part of the observed mechanism but not "heat" itself which is just a transaction, not the goods, so what causes the vibration?

Heat is sometimes called a process quantity, because it is defined in the context of a process by which energy can be transferred. We don't talk about a cup of coffee containing heat, but we can talk about the heat transferred from the cup of hot coffee to your hand.

[jliat]

Or darkness is not a perception but the inability to perceive

no, darkness is the perception of weak photons...

Perception (from the Latin perceptio) is the organization, identification, and interpretation of sensory information in order to represent and understand the presented information, or the environment.

Absolute darkness is when like silence there is nothing to perceive. This may or may not be physically possible but it is in terms of information.
Silence is continious DC in PCM data. Given the CD audio specs a possibility of 65536 "types" -
If there is no sensory information there is no possibility of representation, organisation etc.

Just as silence is impossible to perceive, John Cage was wrong.

no, silence is impossible to hear

That is just what I was saying. You can't perceive silence. I said silence is impossible to perceive - i.e. hear.

Heat is the vibration of matter, or wave/particles in the electro magnetic spectrum, i.e. infrared.

no, that is part of the observed mechanism but not "heat" itself which is just a transaction, not the goods, so what causes the vibration?

Heat is sometimes called a process quantity, because it is defined in the context of a process by which energy can be transferred. We don't talk about a cup of coffee containing heat, but we can talk about the heat transferred from the cup of hot coffee to your hand.

Heat and light are part of the electromagnetic spectrum, the difference is our perception, but the energy is of the same type. We dont observe X rays, Gamma Rays, radio waves... but they are 'there'.

What causes the vibration? Well i guess the current theory is the Big Bang, which you do not accept. And in the exchange of "heat" for work the entropy increases into the heat death. A one way ride... the energy reaches a final state where no processing can take place...
- current theory - and yet there is a probability of this not being true - in QM terms. In this case its the boiling of water which excites the molecules = heat.

[killing raven sun]

Absolute darkness...

doesnt exist except as thought form

is when like silence there is nothing to perceive.

there is always something to perceive even when you are dead

This may or may not be physically possible but it is in terms of information.

no, there is never "no information", that is a condition that cannot exist, there are no voids in the universe

Silence is continious DC in PCM data.

no, lack of signal is perceived as silence by the listener, PCM data knows nothing of sound

no, silence is impossible to hear

That is just what I was saying.

then why did you say perceive instead of hear?

You can't perceive silence. I said silence is impossible to perceive - i.e. hear.

hearing and perceiving are different things, you always perceive everything, but hearing is limited to vibratory stimulus

Heat and light are part of the electromagnetic spectrum, the difference is our perception, but the energy is of the same type. We dont observe X rays, Gamma Rays, radio waves... but they are 'there'.

if you dont observe something then you dont know it is there, X rays, Gamma Rays, radio waves all have been observed with apparatus, silence and darkness have not

What causes the vibration? Well i guess the current theory is the Big Bang,

the big bang causes the suns heat? derp

which you do not accept.

nobody does, its retarded

And in the exchange of "heat" for work the entropy increases into the heat death. A one way ride... the energy reaches a final state where no processing can take place...

no, not one way, its called "reheating", humans even have special machines for it called ovens

In this case its the boiling of water which excites the molecules = heat.

how do you boil water? do you use an electric stove, or maybe you have a gas flame, in any case you use an electrical device to spread heat inductively

[jliat]

Absolute darkness...

doesnt exist except as thought form

Then it exists - even in your idea of everything being electric - its actual substance in your case is no different! Moreover things like prime numbers exist - but only as thought forms? Fibonacci numbers...

is when like silence there is nothing to perceive.

there is always something to perceive even when you are dead

Quite a few people think likewise. But being 'unconscious' is just that!

This may or may not be physically possible but it is in terms of information.

no, there is never "no information", that is a condition that cannot exist, there are no voids in the universe

But one can have the idea! (see above)

Silence is continuous DC in PCM data.

no, lack of signal is perceived as silence by the listener, PCM data knows nothing of sound

True - never the less it exists. Unless you are a Berkelean!

no, silence is impossible to hear

That is just what I was saying.

then why did you say perceive instead of hear?

Because we perceive via the senses, sound = hearing.

You can't perceive silence. I said silence is impossible to perceive - i.e. hear.

hearing and perceiving are different things, you always perceive everything, but hearing is limited to vibratory stimulus

I disagree - but if you do then 'thought forms' are things, which means you perceive them.. ergo by your idea they are 'real'.

Heat and light are part of the electromagnetic spectrum, the difference is our perception, but the energy is of the same type. We dont observe X rays, Gamma Rays, radio waves... but they are 'there'.

if you dont observe something then you dont know it is there, X rays, Gamma Rays, radio waves all have been observed with apparatus, silence and darkness have not

By definition they cant be observed, unless if your case is true then they are perceived.

What causes the vibration? Well i guess the current theory is the Big Bang,

the big bang causes the suns heat? derp

In that theory yes. And eventually the universe in that theory runs down to heat death.

which you do not accept.

nobody does, its retarded

No - lots do - watch the Thunderbolts videos - they are always attacking Big Bang cosmologists.

And in the exchange of "heat" for work the entropy increases into the heat death. A one way ride... the energy reaches a final state where no processing can take place...

no, not one way, its called "reheating", humans even have special machines for it called ovens

But the oven needs a source of power, gas, wood, electric, and are never 100% efficient so 'useful' energy is lost. We can have ovens but perpetual motion machines.

In this case its the boiling of water which excites the molecules = heat.

how do you boil water? do you use an electric stove, or maybe you have a gas flame, in any case you use an electrical device to spread heat inductively

Sure and the law of themodynamics says this increases entropy. The amount of energy remains the same, but it becomes eventually no longer useful. This is classical ohysics that even the thuderbolts crew sign up to. They are electrical engineers, so know this stuff.

[killing raven sun]

then why did you say perceive instead of hear?

Because we perceive via the senses, sound = hearing.

sound = hearing tell it to the deaf... oh wait

hearing and perceiving are different things, you always perceive everything, but hearing is limited to vibratory stimulus

I disagree - but if you do then 'thought forms' are things, which means you perceive them.. ergo by your idea they are 'real'.

sure, they are temporary, plastic, nonlocalised fields of energy, that is all

Sure and the law of themodynamics says this increases entropy. The amount of energy remains the same, but it becomes eventually no longer useful. This is classical ohysics that even the thuderbolts crew sign up to. They are electrical engineers, so know this stuff.

so what? it looks like you are just barfing out word salad because you have no point

[jliat]

I disagree - but if you do then 'thought forms' are things, which means you perceive them.. ergo by your idea they are 'real'.

sure, they are temporary, plastic, nonlocalised fields of energy, that is all

So they are temporary.... ideas like 'nothing', 'zero, fibinachi numbers, infinity... and no localised? where, and what happens to the energy?
I mean the tree in the garden is real, I perceived it, and it is temporary...

Sure and the law of themodynamics says this increases entropy. The amount of energy remains the same, but it becomes eventually no longer useful. This is classical physics that even the thuderbolts crew sign up to. They are electrical engineers, so know this stuff.

so what? it looks like you are just barfing out word salad because you have no point

Looks can be deceptive. The so what if you agree that the law of entropy holds means that even an electric universe will run down... and given you dont like a big bang 14 billion years ago, then again an infinitely expanding universe in infinite time gives you more problems...

[killing raven sun]

So they are temporary.... ideas like 'nothing', 'zero, fibinachi numbers, infinity...

no, ideas arent temporary, thoughts are, ideas endure beyond the individual, trapped in words and objects, like 'nothing' which means very little as its open to much interpretive thought that cannot be shared

and no localised? where, and what happens to the energy?
I mean the tree in the garden is real, I perceived it, and it is temporary...

your perception of it is temporary but the tree is still making noise when it falls, the information is always there for all to access, or not, as is your ability

The so what if you agree that the law of entropy holds means that even an electric universe will run down... and given you dont like a big bang 14 billion years ago, then again an infinitely expanding universe in infinite time gives you more problems...

jesus, more big bang evolutionary gibberish, why do you think baseless outdated flawed and falsified reasoning can be used to argue your points? there is no evidence for a heat death scenario and everyday there are new findings on the real mechanics of energy, but its james so "facts be damned! i will cherry pick arguements for arguments sake! i dont know shit about science and dont care to learn but i sure can rake the mud!", even if i direct you to resources that refute your assertion you will ignore them and move on to another arguement on another point you dont understand, so thats great because the more stupid dooshery you post instead of thoughtful rebuttal just helps prove that the standard model has nothing going for it but a few science illiterate mud slingers

[jliat]

jesus, more big bang evolutionary gibberish, why do you think baseless outdated flawed and falsified reasoning can be used to argue your points? there is no evidence for a heat death scenario and everyday there are new findings on the real mechanics of energy, but its james so "facts be damned! i will cherry pick arguements for arguments sake! i dont know shit about science and dont care to learn but i sure can rake the mud!", even if i direct you to resources that refute your assertion you will ignore them and move on to another arguement on another point you dont understand, so thats great because the more stupid dooshery you post instead of thoughtful rebuttal just helps prove that the standard model has nothing going for it but a few science illiterate mud slingers

Olbers' paradox goes for the perceived universe, any theory must account for it. You look through a telescope and have a few others around to do same, Olbers' paradox - check it out - "when viewed through a telescope the sky is all lights everywhere you look" Is not the case. The Thunderbolts video was wrong after just 50 seconds and all your mental gymnastics don't make it right.

[killing raven sun]

Olbers' paradox goes for the perceived universe, any theory must account for it.

no, it is isolated speculation, the universe is not static, all things move and change continuously, olbers paradox is more outdated gibberish

You look through a telescope and have a few others around to do same, Olbers' paradox - check it out - "when viewed through a telescope the sky is all lights everywhere you look" Is not the case.

well, not the case for you and your limited perception, you need a better telescope, mine is made from ayahuasca

The Thunderbolts video was wrong after just 50 seconds and all your mental gymnastics don't make it right.

the video was right and all your empty acusations dont make it wrong

[jliat]

Olbers' paradox goes for the perceived universe, any theory must account for it.

no, it is isolated speculation, the universe is not static, all things move and change continuously, olbers paradox is more outdated gibberish

Nope - and its a fact - the night sky is dark, moreover one that can be perceived.

You look through a telescope and have a few others around to do same, Olbers' paradox - check it out - "when viewed through a telescope the sky is all lights everywhere you look" Is not the case.

well, not the case for you and your limited perception, you need a better telescope, mine is made from ayahuasca

I've used several, even a fairly large one at The City of Birmingham University.

The psychedelic effects of ayahuasca include visual and auditory stimulation, the mixing of sensory modalities, and psychological introspection that may lead to great elation, fear, or illumination. Its purgative properties are important (known as la purga or "the purge"). The intense vomiting and occasional diarrhea...

So you aren't shitting me this time for sure

People who have consumed ayahuasca report having mystical or religious experiences and spiritual revelations regarding their purpose on earth, the true nature of the universe, and deep insight into how to be the best person they possibly can.[37] This is viewed by many as a spiritual awakening and what is often described as a rebirth.[38]:67–70 In addition, it is often reported that individuals feel they gain access to higher spiritual dimensions and make contact with various spiritual or extra-dimensional beings who can act as guides or healers.

OK - makes sense now.

The Thunderbolts video was wrong after just 50 seconds and all your mental gymnastics don't make it right.

the video was right and all your empty acusations dont make it wrong

Not my assertions - the paradox was known 6th C AD.

Anyway - now we know you get your "knowledge" from dope.

[killing raven sun]

the night sky is dark, moreover one that can be perceived.

it can only be perceived

Not my assertions - the paradox was known 6th C AD.

yeah, we know you get your "knowledge" from dopes

[killing raven sun]

the first ten minutes she reviews the standard model then she talks about the observational problems(neutrinos have mass ) then she makes excuses for their ignorance, specifically that computers arent good enough for their made up models so instead of just doing real science through experimentation she implores us to believe in the broken falsified model because gosh golly its really swell

[jliat]

the first ten minutes she reviews the standard model then she talks about the observational problems(neutrinos have mass ) then she makes excuses for their ignorance, specifically that computers arent good enough for their made up models so instead of just doing real science through experimentation she implores us to believe in the broken falsified model because gosh golly its really swell

Yes i'm familiar with this pop-physics type of thing. To paraphrase - she wants to understand the standard model, find out where it breaks down so as to learn new things... this is typical of science. Its why science moved from an earth centred ptolemy model, to the current ones.
The alternative, to just drop some acid and get the knowledge direct from the god head is much cheaper, and as you know, absolute!

[killing raven sun]

Yes i'm familiar with this pop-physics type of thing.

pop physics? from mit? da fuck is wrong with you?

To paraphrase - she wants to understand the standard model,

yeah, i already paraphrased what she said

find out where it breaks down so as to learn new things...

but ten minutes in she delineates exactly the major problems, the breakdowns are already well known

this is typical of science.

she advocates making better models of the broken model but gee we dont have the computational power, so the future is where she lives, total insanity

The alternative, to just drop some acid and get the knowledge direct from the god head is much cheaper, and as you know, absolute!

no, the alternative is to do real science based on observation and experimentation, but im not surpised you dont know that

[killing raven sun]

james, stop being a dumb cunt.