global warming hoax near end

"Don't post anything racist/misogynistic/pornographic, loli images, or any animated GIFs and you should be fine, haha!" The Raytownian

Moderator: xome

killing raven sun
Posts: 1656
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:01 pm

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by killing raven sun » Fri Dec 14, 2018 5:46 am

WARMISTS ARE THE NEW NAZIS
The hospital is predicting an increase in admissions of at least 4%, and preparations for this year include spending £13m on a new Acute Assessment Unit, designed and built in 11 months and intended to divert patients away from the bottleneck of the emergency department, as well as dealing with referrals from local GPs.

Chief executive Steve Dunn said planning began before last winter had even finished.

"We were rated outstanding last January but we didn't feel outstanding, so we started planning for this year. We have built the acute assessment unit in time for winter.

"We are also running services in the community, including a ward in a care home. Now we have to staff that extra capacity, but if we can't find the staff to run it safely we won't open that capacity, and that will put pressure on us, but we will have to do our best."

Chief executive Steve Dunn says winter planning began before last winter was over
The apprehension at West Suffolk is echoed nationwide by a chorus of health experts and representative bodies who have warned that this winter may be the worst-ever in the modern NHS.

User avatar
jliat
Posts: 3203
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by jliat » Fri Dec 14, 2018 6:10 am

The apprehension at West Suffolk is echoed nationwide by a chorus of health experts and representative bodies who have warned that this winter may be the worst-ever in the modern NHS.
Performance figures and situation reports released this week reveal a system already under huge strain and close to capacity.
Bed occupancy in the first week of December was 94.2 % across England, close to last winter's post-Christmas peak of 95%, and a third of trusts were at 97%.
And monthly figures for November showed while hospitals were dealing with 1,000 more people every day within the four-hour A&E target than last year, the proportion of the total attendances seen in that time fell to 87.6%, down on last year and well short of the 95% national target.
The NHS Confederation called the figures "deeply troubling", while NHS Providers' chief executive Chris Hopson said "the reality is that trusts can't keep up with three per cent increases in year-on-year attendances".

killing raven sun
Posts: 1656
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:01 pm

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by killing raven sun » Fri Dec 14, 2018 6:22 am

jliat wrote:
Fri Dec 14, 2018 6:10 am
The apprehension at West Suffolk is echoed nationwide by a chorus of health experts and representative bodies who have warned that this winter may be the worst-ever in the modern NHS.
Performance figures and situation reports released this week reveal a system already under huge strain and close to capacity.
Bed occupancy in the first week of December was 94.2 % across England, close to last winter's post-Christmas peak of 95%, and a third of trusts were at 97%.
And monthly figures for November showed while hospitals were dealing with 1,000 more people every day within the four-hour A&E target than last year, the proportion of the total attendances seen in that time fell to 87.6%, down on last year and well short of the 95% national target.
The NHS Confederation called the figures "deeply troubling", while NHS Providers' chief executive Chris Hopson said "the reality is that trusts can't keep up with three per cent increases in year-on-year attendances".
yep, winters just keep getting worse


killing raven sun
Posts: 1656
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:01 pm

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by killing raven sun » Fri Dec 14, 2018 7:18 am

jliat wrote:
Fri Dec 14, 2018 6:32 am
temp.jpg
wow, you really dont understand science do you?

you must think this graph supports some aspect of global warming

unfortunately it does not and you cant make it relevant

do you even know how to read a graph?

oh thats right, theres a whole thread devoted to making fun of your misunderstandings about graphs, shall we revisit that james?

User avatar
WhiteWarlock
Posts: 2012
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:58 am

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by WhiteWarlock » Fri Dec 14, 2018 9:18 am

to hell with you and your hoax fake ass global warming tax for socialized distribution of wealth scam stealing more cash


killing raven sun
Posts: 1656
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:01 pm

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by killing raven sun » Fri Dec 14, 2018 11:13 am

It's ten years to the day that Al Gore predicted the arctic would be ice free in five years, and today there is more ice at the arctic than when he made the prediction.
-Rush Limbaugh :lol:

killing raven sun
Posts: 1656
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:01 pm

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by killing raven sun » Fri Dec 28, 2018 5:59 pm

mandatory viewing

fucking excellent

User avatar
jliat
Posts: 3203
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by jliat » Sat Dec 29, 2018 7:28 am

^^^^


I liked this guy. The CIA hushing up the sun which Novas every 12,000 years..

tiny problem though its at odds with EU theory, in Vogl's the sun is powered by information at its centre, which
turns to matter at the surface.

These Novas spew out dust, not plasma, containing elements including Gold.

The canyons on Mars were made by rivers... and the suns novas every 12,000 years and strips water from oceans including the earth's to make comets... dirty snowballs..

Stars are born in Quasars..

An interesting theory, he finds much evidence for this in the Torah. Thanks for sharing.

killing raven sun
Posts: 1656
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:01 pm

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by killing raven sun » Sat Dec 29, 2018 7:45 am

jliat wrote:
Sat Dec 29, 2018 7:28 am
^^^^


I liked this guy. The CIA hushing up the sun which Novas every 12,000 years..
i knew you would, i could almost hear your head sploding
jliat wrote:
Sat Dec 29, 2018 7:28 am
tiny problem though its at odds with EU theory, in Vogl's the sun is powered by information at its centre, which
turns to matter at the surface.

These Novas spew out dust, not plasma, containing elements including Gold.

The canyons on Mars were made by rivers... and the suns novas every 12,000 years and strips water from oceans including the earth's to make comets... dirty snowballs..

Stars are born in Quasars..

An interesting theory, he finds much evidence for this in the Torah. Thanks for sharing.
its not EU related, i dont think he knows much about it, i just like his take on the sun going nova

killing raven sun
Posts: 1656
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:01 pm

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by killing raven sun » Wed Jan 30, 2019 9:15 am

Headlines around the world are reporting exceptionally frigid conditions and unusually high levels of snowfall in recent weeks. They tout these events as records, but few people understand how short the record actually is -- usually less than 50 years, a mere instant in Earth’s 4.6-billion year history. The reality is that, when viewed in a wider context, there is nothing unusual about current weather patterns.

Despite this fact, the media -- directly, indirectly, or by inference -- often attribute the current weather to global warming. Yes, they now call it climate change. But that is because activists realized, around 2004, that the warming predicted by the computer models on which the scare is based was not actually happening. Carbon dioxide (CO2) levels continued to increase, but the temperature stopped increasing. So, the evidence no longer fit the theory. English biologist Thomas Huxley commented on this dilemma over a century ago:


"The great tragedy of science -- the slaying of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact."

Yet, the recent weather is a stark reminder that a colder world is a much greater threat than a warmer one. While governments plan for warming, all the indications are that the world is cooling. And, contrary to the proclamations of climate activists, every single year more people die from the cold than from the heat.

A study in British medical journal The Lancet reached the following conclusion:

Cold weather kills 20 times as many people as hot weather, according to an international study analyzing over 74 million deaths in 384 locations across 13 countries.

How did this bizarre situation develop? It was a deliberate, orchestrated deception. The results of the investigation of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) were deliberately premeditated to focus on the negative impacts of warming. In their original 1988 mandate from the UN, global warming is mentioned three times, while cooling is not mentioned even once. The UN notes that:

[C]ontinued growth in atmospheric concentrations of "greenhouse" gases could produce global warming with an eventual rise in sea levels, the effects of which could be disastrous for mankind if timely steps are not taken at all levels.

This narrow focus was reinforced when the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, a body the IPCC is required to support, defined climate change as being caused by human activity.

IPCC Working Group 1 (WG1) produced the evidence that human-created CO2 was causing global warming. That finding became the premise for Working Group 2 (WG2), which examined the negative impact, and Working Group 3 (WG3), which proposed mitigation policies and actions to stop the warming. The IPCC did not follow the mandatory scientific method of allowing for the null hypothesis; namely, what to do if evidence shows CO2 is not causing warming.

As MIT professor emeritus of atmospheric meteorology Richard Lindzen said, they reached a consensus before the research even began. The consensus “proved” the hypothesis was correct, regardless of the evidence. To reinforce the point, the UK government hired Lord Nicholas Stern, a British economist, to produce an economic review of the impact of warming. Instead of doing a normal cost/benefit analysis as any non-political economist would do, he produced what became known as the 2006 Stern Review -- which only examined the cost.


If Stern and the IPCC did a proper study, they would find that the impact of cooling is much more deleterious to all life on Earth, especially humans. Anthropologists tell us two great advances in human evolution gave us more control of the cold. Fire and clothing both created microclimates that allowed us to live in regions normally inaccessible. Consider the city of Winnipeg, with three technological umbilical cords: the electricity from the north, the gas from the west, and the water pipeline from the east. Three grenades set off at 2:00 a.m. on a January morning with temperatures of -30°C would render the city frozen solid within hours.

Between 1940 and 1980, global temperatures went down. The consensus by 1970 was that global cooling was underway and would continue. Lowell Ponte’s 1976 book The Cooling typified the alarmism:

It is cold fact: the global cooling presents humankind with the most important social, political, and adaptive challenge we have had to deal with for ten thousand years. Your stake in the decisions we make concerning it is of ultimate importance; the survival of ourselves, our children, our species.

Change the seventh word to warming, and it is the same threat heard today. The big difference is that cooling is a much greater threat. To support that claim, the CIA produced at least two reports examining the social and political unrest aggravated mainly by crop failure due to cooling conditions. The World Meteorological Organization also did several studies on the historical impact of cooling on selected agricultural regions, and projected further global cooling.

The sad part about all this is that there was a strategy that governments could, and should, have adopted. It is called game theory, and it allows you to make the best decision in uncertain circumstances. It requires accurate information and the exclusion of a biased political agenda. The first accurate information is that cold is a greater threat and a more difficult adaptation than to warming. After all, if you prepare for warming, as most governments are now doing, and it cools, the problems are made ten times worse. However, if you prepare for cold and it warms, the adjustment is much easier.

The current cold weather across much of the world should prompt us to re-examine climate realities -- not the false, deceptive, and biased views created and promoted by deep state bureaucrats through their respective governments.

killing raven sun
Posts: 1656
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:01 pm

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by killing raven sun » Fri Feb 01, 2019 3:08 am

3 Decades of Global Warming Predictions Have Failed

In the 1970s, the left was pushing a climate scare tactic known as Global Cooling. Its purpose was to frighten Americans into voting for unaccountable federal programs that would strangle business and citizens with high taxes and out of control regulations.

There was even a popular Iron Maiden song about it called Total Eclipse with overtly anti-human lyrics. “Sunrise has gone, freezing up the fires. Sunrise has gone, numbing our desires.”

You get the picture.

But Global Cooling never happened. They needed a new climate game. So, in 1988, a 30-year Global Warming forecast was published. Can you even imagine the backroom conversations that must have went on?

SCENE: In a smoky conservatory, Somewhere in Washington, D.C…

Globalist #1: (slams a glass of bourbon on the table) ‘Our global cooling scam didn’t work, Stanton. What do we do now?’

Globalist #2: ‘Initiate operation Global Warming (opens mouth for a sinister laugh)’

Globalist #3: (steps away from the Slip-N-Slide) ‘Not so fast Leopold! The public needs at least ten years to forget this whole global cooling debacle. We’ll publish a global warming scare sometime in the late 80s.’

Globalist #1: ‘But what’ll we do till then, Reginald?’

Globalist #3: ‘I don’t know, drown teenagers at Lolita Island and have those Clinton kids in Arkansas cover it up? They seem desperate to prove themselves!’

All: (Laugh uproariously)

Fast forward 30 years and guess what, global warming projections for the last three decades have turned out to be just as wrong as the global cooling projections of the 70s. The Wall Street Journal has just released a review of the predictions, and they have never even come close to being correct. It’s almost like they just made it up from whole cloth.

In June of 1988, NASA climatologist James Hansen testified before a Senate Committee saying; “We have concluded, with a high degree of confidence that a cause and effect relationship exists between the claimed CO2 induced greenhouse effect and observed warming.”

A note: Whenever the Government is lying about a scientific issue, you’re bound to hear weasel phrases like “high degree of confidence.”

According to the primary source material from the predictions, actual surface temperatures were increasing between the years 1960 and 1990. But in 1990, the projections look like a rocket while actual surface temperatures increase at a much slower rate. Temperature predictions for the current year are double what they actually are.

Climate models developed by the United Nations around the same time are equally faulty. But how could they be so wrong? The projections were based on a sharp increase in temperatures between the years 1984 and 1989. Surface temperatures dipped sharply in the previous four years, and then began to rise. The projections in the Global Warming Forecast of 1988 was based on a four-year trend.

It’s almost as if these experts took a crash course in global climatology in 1983 and then started looking at current data and panicked. That’s the most generous interpretation of the facts we could muster. But the fact that they wanted to hijack the entire government and rig the economy transforms what might have been a huge mistake into an attempted power grab of epic proportions.

The models for global warming are based on very brief temperature trends and do not take even decades-long temperature records into account. On top of this, they want us to believe that 97% of climate scientists agree with projections based on a four year period. That would mean 97% of them are wrong, and the next time they claim a huge consensus, we should simply ignore it outright.

All of this may be laughable. Yes, it makes people like Al Gore- who predicted that the ice caps would be liquefied by now- look like standard issue con men. But don’t think for a moment that they didn’t get everything they wanted. They did.

Huge environmental agencies with lots of political power have been created, and over the years, more than a billion dollars has been shoved into the pockets of the people crying wolf.

If you want a prediction you can count on, try this one on for size: The climate change scare will fade into obscurity over the next ten years. The public will forget about it. Then, sometime around 2088, global cooling will make headlines… and with a high degree of confidence, we predict Iron Maiden will stage a comeback tour.

killing raven sun
Posts: 1656
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:01 pm

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by killing raven sun » Fri Feb 01, 2019 3:31 am

killing raven sun wrote:
Fri Dec 14, 2018 6:22 am
jliat wrote:
Fri Dec 14, 2018 6:10 am
The apprehension at West Suffolk is echoed nationwide by a chorus of health experts and representative bodies who have warned that this winter may be the worst-ever in the modern NHS.
Performance figures and situation reports released this week reveal a system already under huge strain and close to capacity.
Bed occupancy in the first week of December was 94.2 % across England, close to last winter's post-Christmas peak of 95%, and a third of trusts were at 97%.
And monthly figures for November showed while hospitals were dealing with 1,000 more people every day within the four-hour A&E target than last year, the proportion of the total attendances seen in that time fell to 87.6%, down on last year and well short of the 95% national target.
The NHS Confederation called the figures "deeply troubling", while NHS Providers' chief executive Chris Hopson said "the reality is that trusts can't keep up with three per cent increases in year-on-year attendances".
yep, winters just keep getting worse
All four UK countries set new records for this winter overnight with Magilligan in County Londonderry, Northern Ireland, falling to -8.5C (16.7F), Sennybridge in Powys, South Wales, down to -9.3C (15.3F), and Redesdale Camp in Northumberland at -10.5C (13.1F).

killing raven sun
Posts: 1656
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:01 pm

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by killing raven sun » Fri Feb 01, 2019 3:38 am

jliat wrote:
Fri Dec 14, 2018 6:32 am
Image
48,000 Brits dead after worst winter in 42 years
THE UK is being hit by its worst winter death toll in 42 years

By Hayley Coyle / Published 7th April 2018

Department of Health chief medical officer Professor Dame Sally Davies, said: “Cold-related deaths represent the biggest weather-related source of mortality.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 6 guests