global warming hoax near end

"Don't post anything racist/misogynistic/pornographic, loli images, or any animated GIFs and you should be fine, haha!" The Raytownian

Moderator: xome

User avatar
jliat
Posts: 4467
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by jliat » Fri Aug 17, 2018 6:55 am

WhiteWarlock wrote:
Fri Aug 17, 2018 6:40 am
FYI
"meltdown"
melts through "concrete" into the water table
https://www.quora.com/Is-fukushima-nucl ... -the-ocean

So here is your "source"- and a response to it.


Michael DiSalvo, Head tutor at A+ Tutoring/ Test Preparation (2005-present) Superfood Specialist,
Answered Sep 20, 2014
Originally Answered: How long will the Fukushima nuclear disaster continue on leaking radiation?

Indeed, the Fukushima nuclear powerplant will continue leaking radiation indefinitely as all of facilities there have basically gone into nuclear meltdown for some time.



Mark Laris, I am a Nuclear Engineer
Dec 12, 2015
Where did you get this stuff? To say it is complete nonsense is to give a bad name to pure nonsense.



As of 2015 it can be assumed that most fuel melted through the reactor pressure vessel (RPV), commonly known as the "reactor core") and is resting on the bottom of the primary containment vessel (PCV), having been stopped by the PCV concrete.[114][115][116][117] In July 2017 a remotely controlled robot filmed for the first time apparently melted fuel, just below the pressure vessel of Unit 3.The report concluded that the Unit 1 RPV was damaged during the disaster and that "significant amounts" of molten fuel had fallen into the bottom of the PCV. The erosion of the concrete of the PCV by the molten fuel after the core meltdown was estimated to stop at approx. 0.7 meters (2 ft 4 in) in depth, while the thickness of the containment is 7.6 meters (25 ft) thick.
https://soundcloud.com/jliat/sets/jliat ... variations
https://soundcloud.com/jliat/sets/jliat ... tions-from
"The most irrational thing to do is to make something worthless, with no political emotional or entertaining purpose."

User avatar
WhiteWarlock
Posts: 2682
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:58 am

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by WhiteWarlock » Fri Aug 17, 2018 7:00 am

Continuous leaking of radioactive strontium, cesium from Fukushima to the ocean

Scientists from the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB) investigated the levels of radioactive strontium and cesium in the coast off Japan in September 2013. Radioactive levels in seawater were 10 to 100 times higher than before the nuclear accident, particularly near the facility, suggesting that water containing strontium and cesium isotopes was still leaking into the Pacific Ocean.

March 11 will be the 5th anniversary since the nuclear accident in Fukushima, Japan. The Tohoku earthquake and the series of tsunamis damaged the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant (FDNPP) causing a massive release of radioactivity into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean. Since then, the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) and the Japanese authorities have focused on controlling the water flowing in and out of the FDNPP and on decontaminating the highly radioactive water used as coolant for the damaged reactors (about 300 m3 a day, cubic meter = 1000 L). This cooling water is then stored in tanks and, to some extent, being decontaminated.

A new study recently published in Environmental Science and Technology, uses data on the concentrations of 90Sr and 134,137Cs in the coast off Japan from the moment of the accident until September 2013, and puts it into a longer-time perspective including published data and TEPCO's monitoring data available until June 2015. This study continues the work initiated after the accident in 2011 by some of the authors. These and other partners from Belgium and Japan are currently involved in the European FRAME project lead by Dr. Pere Masqué that aims at studying the impact of recent releases from the Fukushima nuclear accident on the marine environment. FRAME is encompassed within the European COMET project (https://wiki.ceh.ac.uk/display/COM/COMET-FRAME).

Seawater collected from the sea surface down to 500 m between 1 and 110 km off the FDNPP showed concentrations up to 9, 124 and 54 Bq·m−3 for 90Sr, 137Cs and 134Cs, respectively. The highest concentrations, found within 6 km off the FDNPP, were approximately 9, 100 and 50 times higher, respectively, than pre-Fukushima levels. Before the accident, the main source of these radionuclides was atmospheric deposition due to nuclear bomb testing performed in the 1950s and 1960s. The presence of 134Cs (undetectable before the accident) and the distinct relationship between 90Sr and 137Cs in the samples suggested that FDNPP was leaking 90Sr at a rate of 2,3 -- 8,5 GBq d-1 (giga-Becquerel per day) into the Pacific Ocean in September 2013. Such a leak would be 100-1000 times larger than the amount of 90Sr transported by rivers from land to ocean. Additional risk is related to the large amounts of water stored in tanks that have frequently leaked in the past. These results are in agreement with TEPCO's monitoring data which show levels of 90Sr and 137Cs up to 10 and 1000 times higher than pre-Fukushima near the discharge channels of the FDNPP until June 2015 (most recent data included in the study). The presence of 90Sr and 134,137Cs in significant amounts until 2015 suggests the need of a continuous monitoring of artificial radionuclides in the Pacific Ocean.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2 ... 080824.htm

User avatar
jliat
Posts: 4467
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by jliat » Fri Aug 17, 2018 7:14 am

Fukashima is spewing radioactive core meltdown death into the ocean at extinction event levels
These results confirm that the radiation level of sampled water are substantially below the operational targets set by TEPCO.
The presence of 90Sr and 134,137Cs in significant amounts until 2015 suggests the need of a continuous monitoring of artificial radionuclides in the Pacific Ocean.
So " until 2015" and not " leaking radiation indefinitely ... the massive amount of radiation released. "
https://soundcloud.com/jliat/sets/jliat ... variations
https://soundcloud.com/jliat/sets/jliat ... tions-from
"The most irrational thing to do is to make something worthless, with no political emotional or entertaining purpose."

killing raven sun
Posts: 1791
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:01 pm

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by killing raven sun » Fri Aug 17, 2018 7:26 am

killing raven sun wrote:
Fri Aug 17, 2018 6:41 am
jliat wrote: ↑Mon Aug 13, 2018 12:24 am
Look - i dont actually care, So i cant do the reading because i wont understand it.

User avatar
jliat
Posts: 4467
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by jliat » Fri Aug 17, 2018 7:38 am

The Chernobyl disaster released roughly 10 PBq, or about 5% of the core inventory, of strontium-90 into the environment.

The Fukushima Daiichi disaster released 0.1-1 PBq of strontium-90 in the form of contaminated cooling water into the Pacific Ocean.

The ocean contains many small sources of naturally occurring radiation that in most places exceeds the dose provided by radioisotopes released from Fukushima. In addition, the remnants of nuclear weapons testing in the 1960s and 70s are also still detectable around the world. Except for locations on land in Japan and sites near the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant, all of these sources combined pose little risk to human health.
-Center for Marine and Environmental Radioactivity
https://soundcloud.com/jliat/sets/jliat ... variations
https://soundcloud.com/jliat/sets/jliat ... tions-from
"The most irrational thing to do is to make something worthless, with no political emotional or entertaining purpose."



User avatar
WhiteWarlock
Posts: 2682
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:58 am

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by WhiteWarlock » Fri Aug 17, 2018 8:08 am

Chernobyl 1-3 months before containment(inland)
Fukashima 7+ years no containment(on pacific beachfront)

User avatar
jliat
Posts: 4467
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by jliat » Fri Aug 17, 2018 8:12 am

So we have someone - who knows - but colourful vocabulary if a little limited... who I suppose you would believe rather than marine biologists or a nuclear engineers, or some scientists when you can see the sea weed has cancer.

But - even if marine life is dying, that doesn't link it to radiation. For that i'm afraid you need to do some science.
hat Fukashima is spewing radioactive core meltdown death into the ocean at extinction event levels
The guy making the videos seems quite alive. So you've given up Tuna?
https://soundcloud.com/jliat/sets/jliat ... variations
https://soundcloud.com/jliat/sets/jliat ... tions-from
"The most irrational thing to do is to make something worthless, with no political emotional or entertaining purpose."

User avatar
jliat
Posts: 4467
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by jliat » Fri Aug 17, 2018 8:23 am

OMG


Main article: Tritium illumination
The beta particles emitted by the radioactive decay of small amounts of tritium cause chemicals called phosphors to glow. This radioluminescence is used in self-powered lighting devices called betalights, which are used for night illumination of firearm sights, watches, exit signs, map lights, knives and a variety of other devices.
https://soundcloud.com/jliat/sets/jliat ... variations
https://soundcloud.com/jliat/sets/jliat ... tions-from
"The most irrational thing to do is to make something worthless, with no political emotional or entertaining purpose."

User avatar
jliat
Posts: 4467
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by jliat » Fri Aug 17, 2018 8:26 am

WhiteWarlock wrote:
Fri Aug 17, 2018 8:08 am
Chernobyl 1-3 months before containment(inland)
Fukashima 7+ years no containment(on pacific beachfront)

"The ocean contains many small sources of naturally occurring radiation that in most places exceeds the dose provided by radioisotopes released from Fukushima."
https://soundcloud.com/jliat/sets/jliat ... variations
https://soundcloud.com/jliat/sets/jliat ... tions-from
"The most irrational thing to do is to make something worthless, with no political emotional or entertaining purpose."


User avatar
jliat
Posts: 4467
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by jliat » Fri Aug 17, 2018 8:44 am


Not then "Fukashima is spewing radioactive core meltdown death into the ocean at extinction event levels"
https://soundcloud.com/jliat/sets/jliat ... variations
https://soundcloud.com/jliat/sets/jliat ... tions-from
"The most irrational thing to do is to make something worthless, with no political emotional or entertaining purpose."

User avatar
WhiteWarlock
Posts: 2682
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:58 am

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by WhiteWarlock » Fri Aug 17, 2018 8:53 am

you are the one desperately pretending the entire Fukashima disaster is safe & under control
obviously you aren't worried about it just like everything else except for being contrarian upholding "official narrative policy"
you want master debating
when you are honestly completely fucking apathetic about everything unless you can be annoying for self gratification purposes

killing raven sun
Posts: 1791
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:01 pm

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by killing raven sun » Fri Aug 17, 2018 8:56 am

killing raven sun wrote:
Fri Aug 17, 2018 7:26 am
killing raven sun wrote:
Fri Aug 17, 2018 6:41 am
jliat wrote: ↑Mon Aug 13, 2018 12:24 am
Look - i dont actually care, So i cant do the reading because i wont understand it.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests