I didn't 'magnify' - i actually wasn't aware that this was a common mental problem-clemon!09. wrote:sorry maybe i misunderstood - it was in reference to niall's "imposter" post.jliat wrote:Who is this addressed to? Or is it a comment about yourself?clemon!09. wrote:i don't think it's suitable to magnify someone's innocent mental problems, or to try to make someone feel bad for something they've done well.
but posting it on a blog? Maybe he is a brilliant scientist - maybe a fake? He faked his analysis of my graph - deliverately looking for one with mistakes in it. Then torrents of bad language - maybe Coprolalia associated with Tourette syndrome..? Or just plain abuse?
No one is bothered but he tore into me over a graph lacking an X axis. Then hey - some guys at Manchester with physics Phds used statistical techniques to decide if a text was meaningful or nonsense - and there was a graph with no x axis!