no, duhclemon!09. wrote:no of course i know that. the whole point is that if you over-state the premise does it say something new.
bullshit on stilts
Moderator: xome
- clemon!09.
- Posts: 2851
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2013 8:50 pm
i am saying that rhythms consist of content that is constituted by the semantic meaning of the poem but is distinct - perhaps as follows:
that's not even what i meant tho - support or contradict each other.wow rhythms have a content of their own which can support or contradict the actual denotative content of the words
I'm just going to fuck with you... so get used to it man
- clemon!09.
- Posts: 2851
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2013 8:50 pm
- clemon!09.
- Posts: 2851
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2013 8:50 pm
well like, there's meant to be all these values that appear in pound, and that he is silent on them, only associates one with another.it's just the content of your posts that makes me think you're dimwitted and a fuckwit
it seems then that in some sense, what i am trying to say is not universally held.
I'm just going to fuck with you... so get used to it man
- clemon!09.
- Posts: 2851
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2013 8:50 pm
- clemon!09.
- Posts: 2851
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2013 8:50 pm
meter isn't rhythm??RJMyato wrote:why would pound go far out of his way to preserve the meter of old english or greek originals in english translation (i.e canto I or the seafarer) if he didn't think rhythm constituted a meaningful content outside of the denotative content of the words themselves
don't expect level one discussion with me yet

I'm just going to fuck with you... so get used to it man
- clemon!09.
- Posts: 2851
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2013 8:50 pm
- clemon!09.
- Posts: 2851
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2013 8:50 pm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests