Posted: Thu Jun 20, 2013 11:45 pm
I guess the problem is I'm more interested in actual harsh noise/ HNW than theoretical jliat harsh/HWN, I can actually listen to the former for one thing and not just read a bunch of arguing about it
Discuss all things noise.. or else.
it isn't.HNW isn't indistinguishable from any natural or many accidental noises at all tho.
i don't see what that would achieve other than perhaps proving that the STDEV of HNW is indistinguishable from natural sound.timdrage wrote:*rips clipping camcorder audio from 240p windows movie maker youtube video, futzes about in excel*
O GUYS IVE OBJECTIVELY MEASURE THIS TOTALLY NATURAL SOUND!!!
Sure - that's cool!timdrage wrote:I guess the problem is I'm more interested in actual harsh noise/ HNW than theoretical jliat harsh/HWN, I can actually listen to the former for one thing and not just read a bunch of arguing about it
agreed on thisjliat wrote:and that it might be wrong to assume a human mind can reason reality out - in any fullness.
might disagree to this. i've not had any atom or toothpick convos yet. maybe i should try that.jliat wrote:If we look at the night sky - and ask 'what does it all mean' - and the answer is 'nothing'… then we cant communicate with the universe- anymore than you can have conversations with atoms, or tooth picks.