jliat wrote: ↑Sun May 26, 2019 12:12 amI'm sorry but you seem to misunderstand what i'm saying. Using noise as in harsh noise, or anything gives silence, (this happened by accident! messing with Pulse Demon.. and I soon realised my mistake!) if you use the sample for the reduction envelope, and apply it to that sample you get silence! - so I tried the same process with HNW made from white noise, and YOU DONT GET SILENCE. Sorry to shout but I've said this now at least twice. So big deal IDK. Interesting, for me yes, for you probably not. Is it noise, again IDK, its interesting as its unexpected. (like Aristotle said a heavy object will fall faster than a lighter one, and it took some dumb Italian 1500 years later to prove him wrong!) I'm not trying to make noise i'm messing with stuff and getting strange results...I may not " comprehend using "noise reduction" correctly", I only claim to have used it to remove background noise to enable to listen to a lecturer speak, removing the air con, and also to remove his from recordings. Is my comprehension wrong? Or is the fact that I manged to remove the background noise wrong?WhiteWarlock wrote: ↑Sat May 25, 2019 11:44 pmit does to the misused "noise reduction" effect
this entire "debate" is actually absurd
what is more ironic is that you supposedly comprehend using "noise reduction" correctly
now lets see what the bot says.......................................................................................
The bot says 'xdugef AKA Adrian Dimond' wanted to win an argument, and lost, so getting pissed with me' , as if the nature of randomness and determinacy were my fault! And he keeps saying this and keeps getting more and more pissed, hence this thread!
I do love you though.