Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

"Don't post anything racist/misogynistic/pornographic, loli images, or any animated GIFs and you should be fine, haha!" The Raytownian

Moderator: xome

Post Reply
User avatar
amishrobots
Posts: 1936
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 5:08 pm
Location: Cincinnati Ohio
Contact:

Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by amishrobots » Sat Nov 03, 2018 1:43 am

chem-trails, weather control, solar flares, flouride, mind control, etc?
Sure, great, what are you even doing about it? nothing; just babbling you regurgitated nonsense to anyone who will listen.

"Hey everyone! the Earth is FLAT!!!"
--um, okay, who cares?
"but they are LYING to us!!"
--about the shape of the Earth? why? how does this affect my actual life, and wtf are you, or any of your conspiracy theory heroes even doing to stop it? You're doing nothing. You have had 0% effect on the world around you, congratulations. Meanwhile NASA has sent men to the moon, and now you navigate via GPS (I still use paper maps, but fuck you) If the earth is truly flat, your smartphone is lying to you, and will eventually lead you over the world-cliff to your death. Yet I've heard of that happening to anyone... uh , never.

you all look like fucking morons, because you are.
using spray bottles to full of vinegar to fight chem-trails, and the only real result is the brown patches on your lawn.

Mind controlling chemicals in the water supply? Fuck, why would "they" bother? "They" already have a direct connection to your thought processes, via advertising. So long as they have your money, who cares what you think? Who needs weather control? if it rains they selll umbrellas, and when it doesn't they sell sunblock.

The powers that be hold the purse strings; that's all the leash they need, to make you dance like a puppet.

User avatar
jliat
Posts: 2692
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by jliat » Sat Nov 03, 2018 2:42 am

I agree with much of the above... but :twisted: #

You (I) can perhaps take this further in that even the 'they' that think they are in control might not be,
there might be no one driving the bus (hence the erratic ride!) So...

Paper proposal.

“A music produced by technology, not for pleasure, outside of meaning, usage, and exchange.” (Paraphrase of Jaques Attali)*

Richard Wrangham (Scientific America 2013) and Suzana Herculano-Houzel (Scientific America winter 2014) have proposed that cooking was fundamental in the development of the human brain. “...around the time our human ancestors conquered fire, they also finally broke through the caloric barrier and jumped from brains of perhaps 40 billion brain neurons (Homo habilis) to 60 billion neurons (Homo erectus) “ The significance of technology in the development of art, in music in particular, is obvious, from the vulture bone flues of 4 millennia, though to the ever sophisticated musical instruments, music production and recording via technological developments. The expansion of audiences and development of audiences due to social change and demographics. The development of valve instruments, electronics in recording and sound synthesis in music, printing and communication in the sciences... And more recently new forms of communication and dissemination of ideas and art via the internet. This is often seen as a consequence of technological and economic development, however in Jaques Attali's book, 'Noise', radically, he argues that music is the precursor of such changes. I propose another alternative.

In the case of Wrangham/ Herculano-Houzel's hypothesis the idea that intelligence produces technology is not the case. The technology – of fire – had to precede the intelligence of the bigger brain. This is clear logic. Here the technology came first and produced human intelligence. My paper would present the very contentious idea, which is obviously at first thought wrong, that not only was thinking 1.5 million years ago the product of technology, and not the other way around, but that this has generally been the case. In order to make this case I will look not only at history but the epistemological and ontological problems of the 'conventional' models of intellectual and artistic development, by employing certain arguments from the latter Wittgenstein and Hegel's Logic which show the illogic of the 'obviousness' of thinking being prior to invention & creativity, and these being prior to technology. That as in the case of the original development of human intelligence it has always been the priority of technology at work.
....
and from another proposal -
....

Printing was responsible for the enlightenment, and new forms of literature like the Novel, amongst many other things. Trivially putting oil paint in tubes and the railway system together with a growing bourgeoisie 'caused' impressionism. Advances in technology of the valve gave new musical instruments which directly altered the development of western music. As did a range of other inventions or discoveries. Perhaps the greatest 'accident' was electricity, its properties to be discovered and not invented. It was already there!

The evidence becomes more apparent, the nature of communication is changed with email, text messaging alters language's structure and social media alters political and social systems. In every case the technology arrives first, and only then do we have the actuality.... of the current President of the United States, a product of Twitter!

And all the time a thin illusion is that we use the technology. Yet like playing any game we are bound by its rules and can only follow them, and can only produce and use these in ways already inherent in them.

Finally:

'We are the product of technology and not the producers of technology.'

So what are we to do if this is true?

Try to enjoy the ride!

User avatar
melkobukva
Posts: 322
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2018 6:35 pm

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by melkobukva » Sat Nov 03, 2018 3:08 am

amishrobots wrote:
Sat Nov 03, 2018 1:43 am
Sure, great, what are you even doing about it?
nice try, mr. mind-controlled illuminati snitch
ain't telling you no nothing 8)

killing raven sun
Posts: 844
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:01 pm

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by killing raven sun » Sat Nov 03, 2018 3:27 am

0/10

:(

User avatar
WhiteWarlock
Posts: 1776
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:58 am

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by WhiteWarlock » Sat Nov 03, 2018 9:02 am

You can choose to bury you head in the sands of Ignorance
whilst getting raped in the ass
riding your bong into Oblivion
chasing being "cool"
fantasizing about some socialist utopia with freebies
there is most likely nothing you can do
or have the mental ability for even comprehending
don't worry you aren't alone in being willingly brainwashed
it's not as if you have ever seen behind the curtain and through the illusions
or really cared enough for making any effort
yet others have spent lifetime warning others of the obvious
and not so obvious
that eventually have had an effect on human collective consciousness
hey at least it's not the ancient roman corruption or bolshevik red terror era
Would you have said that was all a "conspiracy theory" then to try saving your own ass?
probably not...
since the overloads hadn't used that programming for covering up crimes
you would probably have just reported us to the Inquisition as "Witches"/"Heretics"/"Blasphemers"
or reported us the Cheka(VChK) as anti-soviet
Last edited by WhiteWarlock on Sat Nov 03, 2018 9:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
jliat
Posts: 2692
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by jliat » Sat Nov 03, 2018 9:36 am

WhiteWarlock wrote:
Sat Nov 03, 2018 9:02 am
etc.
And the OP's opening point remains-

"Sure, great, what are you even doing about it? nothing; just babbling you regurgitated nonsense to anyone who will listen. "

User avatar
WhiteWarlock
Posts: 1776
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:58 am

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by WhiteWarlock » Sat Nov 03, 2018 9:38 am

that is far beyond your limited comprehension skills
plus it is already completed
with intended results obtained
& wasn't "easy"

User avatar
WhiteWarlock
Posts: 1776
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:58 am

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by WhiteWarlock » Sat Nov 03, 2018 9:42 am

Don't worry about any of it...
you don't really worry about any of it anyway
nor do you have any required abilities for such things
not really an insult
we have different backgrounds, life experiences, and skillsets
with our own consciousness
hmmm
otherwise we would all be the same
obviously not all people are created equal...
that is propaganda mass mind control cult programing
Image
How about you make some trax for Granular comp?
Last edited by WhiteWarlock on Sat Nov 03, 2018 9:53 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
jliat
Posts: 2692
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by jliat » Sat Nov 03, 2018 9:52 am

WhiteWarlock wrote:
Sat Nov 03, 2018 9:38 am
that is far beyond your limited comprehension skills
plus it is already completed
with intended results obtained
& wasn't "easy"
I think i can in terms of comprehension i can match yours - give it a try.

User avatar
WhiteWarlock
Posts: 1776
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:58 am

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by WhiteWarlock » Sat Nov 03, 2018 9:54 am

you have already beyond any doubts proven that you can not

User avatar
jliat
Posts: 2692
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by jliat » Sat Nov 03, 2018 9:58 am

WhiteWarlock wrote:
Sat Nov 03, 2018 9:02 am

hey at least it's not the ancient roman corruption or bolshevik red terror era
Would you have said that was all a "conspiracy theory" then to try saving your own ass?
No i wouldnt say these were part of a "conspiracy theory" as they were, and still are, blindingly obvious to everyone.
They were not some hidden phenomena that only those of 'higher' comprehension were aware of!

User avatar
jliat
Posts: 2692
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by jliat » Sat Nov 03, 2018 10:02 am

WhiteWarlock wrote:
Sat Nov 03, 2018 9:54 am
you have already beyond any doubts proven that you can not
Only to you. But then you wont produce this stuff i cannot comprehend. We place such claims in the same category as those who think the world flat, that they can astral project, know the future, and are in reality aliens.

killing raven sun
Posts: 844
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:01 pm

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by killing raven sun » Sat Nov 03, 2018 10:13 am

jliat wrote:
Sat Nov 03, 2018 10:02 am
WhiteWarlock wrote:
Sat Nov 03, 2018 9:54 am
you have already beyond any doubts proven that you can not
Only to you. But then you wont produce this stuff i cannot comprehend.
:lol: no, youve spent years here convincing anyone who engages with you that you are an idiot :lol:

and its your problem to understand, nobody is hiding anything anymore, you just dont want to know

User avatar
WhiteWarlock
Posts: 1776
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:58 am

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by WhiteWarlock » Sat Nov 03, 2018 10:57 am

Do you want me digging up some granular code for you experimenting with?
maybe you can make web Granulator or something in JAVA...
for the upcoming Granular noise comp project
here is book online JAVA Synthesis book for you
http://evanxmerz.com/soundsynthjava/Sou ... _synthesis
http://evanxmerz.com/soundsynthjava/Sou ... oundscapes
seems like way better use of your time/energy/abilities IMO
~shrug~
// instantiate the AudioContext
AudioContext ac = new AudioContext();

// load the source sample from a file
Sample sourceSample = null;
try
{
sourceSample = new Sample("Tubes.wav");
}
catch(Exception e)
{
/*
* If the program exits with an error message,
* then it most likely can't find the file
* or can't open it. Make sure it is in the
* root folder of your project in Eclipse.
* Also make sure that it is a 16-bit,
* 44.1kHz audio file. These can be created
* using Audacity.
*/
System.out.println(e.getMessage());
e.printStackTrace();
System.exit(1);
}

// instantiate a GranularSamplePlayer
GranularSamplePlayer gsp = new GranularSamplePlayer(ac, sourceSample);

// tell gsp to loop the file
gsp.setLoopType(SamplePlayer.LoopType.LOOP_FORWARDS);

// set the grain size to a fixed 10ms
gsp.setGrainSize(new Static(ac, 10.0f));

// tell gsp to behave somewhat randomly
gsp.setRandomness(new Static(ac, 1000.0f));

// connect gsp to ac
ac.out.addInput(gsp);

// begin audio processing
ac.start();
Last edited by WhiteWarlock on Sat Nov 03, 2018 11:02 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
jliat
Posts: 2692
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by jliat » Sat Nov 03, 2018 11:02 am

WhiteWarlock wrote:
Sat Nov 03, 2018 10:57 am
Do you want me digging up some granular code for you experimenting with?
maybe you can make web Granulator or something in JAVA...
here is book online JAVA Synthesis book for you
http://evanxmerz.com/soundsynthjava/Sou ... _synthesis
Thanks for the offer but i'm well able to track down that kind of thing.

'that is far beyond your limited comprehension skills'

In this case no.

Still waiting for examples that are 'far beyond'...

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests