Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

"Don't post anything racist/misogynistic/pornographic, loli images, or any animated GIFs and you should be fine, haha!" The Raytownian

Moderator: xome

User avatar
WhiteWarlock
Posts: 1776
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:58 am

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by WhiteWarlock » Sun Nov 04, 2018 8:07 am

We all are aware of your Ego and your an id
How many times have you been dead in that body?
(not just a deadfuck)
Would you believe eye have been dead and come back more than can remember?
(not because of drugs)
plus really do not feel like going into detail....
Eye have told you before you wouldn't ever believe what is True
so why waste the time/energy attempting explaining specifically for you
it's more for my personal memiors
plus my inner circles
Can you even slightly comprehend that?

User avatar
WhiteWarlock
Posts: 1776
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:58 am

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by WhiteWarlock » Sun Nov 04, 2018 8:12 am

Some things are public some things are private.
You fail obviously comprehending any of that.
Eye reserve the right for being extremely discriminating.
You can pretend and goad and bitch that daring to do so is unacceptable.

User avatar
melkobukva
Posts: 322
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2018 6:35 pm

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by melkobukva » Sun Nov 04, 2018 8:13 am

amishrobots wrote:
Sat Nov 03, 2018 11:57 pm
melkobukva wrote:
Sat Nov 03, 2018 11:43 am
jliat wrote:
Sat Nov 03, 2018 11:35 am
You offered the idea that there was something "that is far beyond your limited comprehension skills"..
but cannot offer any examples.
Sorry to interrupt, but if something is actually beyond your comprehension, then if somebody showed you an example of such a thing, you wouldn't comprehend it anyway, and this defeats the purpose of showing.
examples or stfu.
You have already given one yourself:
amishrobots wrote:
Sun Nov 04, 2018 12:10 am
https://imgur.com/a/SLMaOB5

do you comprehend this image? No? then obviously I am smarter than you. I could try to explain it, but there would be no point, because obviously you are educated-stupid.

If you were smart like I am, you would see the obvious proof that the earth is a five-sided time cube.
But with your stupid minds, you are not ready for the power of solarbanite.
It's not worth my important time to explain it all to you, because you will never understand, and I have better things to do , like telling people on Noiseguide how dumb they are not to understand what I don't have time to show them, because Donald Trump has a natural instinct for science, and so do I.
Just trust me when I say that science is a hoax; because I have a natural instinct for it.
The Earth is flat, like your sister.
People try to explain you stuff, but when it turns out to be beyond your comprehension all you're able to see is self-aggrandizing orange-man-supporting gibberish.

User avatar
jliat
Posts: 2692
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by jliat » Sun Nov 04, 2018 8:56 am

WhiteWarlock wrote:
Sun Nov 04, 2018 8:12 am
Some things are public some things are private.
You fail obviously comprehending any of that.
Eye reserve the right for being extremely discriminating.
You can pretend and goad and bitch that daring to do so is unacceptable.
I fully understand that some things are private and some public. But in your case you made public your greater skills, ... so "far beyond'(exponentially more.. " and my "limited comprehension skills" "plus it is already completed with intended results obtained"

You made these claims public. Quite dramatic claims, "it is already completed with intended results obtained" moreover you then portrayed myself and others as " head in the sands of Ignorance whilst getting raped in the ass riding your bong into Oblivion"
and "or have the mental ability for even comprehending" which could seem rather personal. Now Daric no doubt would say its not, its just honesty. Well the language is fairly abusive.. I find it so, and i'm telling you I do. So if you carry on saying such you show no respect. Then in which case why should I show you any? You are in that case actually being deliberately abusive.

So if you make public claims such as these - i'd expect you to publicly support them. If you want to keep this private, fine.

User avatar
jliat
Posts: 2692
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by jliat » Sun Nov 04, 2018 8:58 am

melkobukva wrote:
Sun Nov 04, 2018 8:13 am

People try to explain you stuff
I must have missed where this happened? Could you link- repost?

User avatar
WhiteWarlock
Posts: 1776
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:58 am

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by WhiteWarlock » Sun Nov 04, 2018 9:05 am

You still haven't commented on this "Conspiracy Theory"
https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org ... randum.pdf
what's wrong? Cat got you tongue?
or is it fear of BigBrother FVEY? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Eyes

User avatar
melkobukva
Posts: 322
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2018 6:35 pm

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by melkobukva » Sun Nov 04, 2018 9:29 am

jliat wrote:
Sun Nov 04, 2018 8:58 am
melkobukva wrote:
Sun Nov 04, 2018 8:13 am

People try to explain you stuff
I must have missed where this happened? Could you link- repost?
Since amishrobots is mocking conspiracy nut explanations in a particular way, he must have experienced them and interpreted them in a particular way. Ergo, no actual examples are needed, we can already deduce what happened from amishrobots' parody post.

User avatar
jliat
Posts: 2692
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by jliat » Sun Nov 04, 2018 9:49 am

melkobukva wrote:
Sun Nov 04, 2018 9:29 am
jliat wrote:
Sun Nov 04, 2018 8:58 am
melkobukva wrote:
Sun Nov 04, 2018 8:13 am

People try to explain you stuff
I must have missed where this happened? Could you link- repost?
Since amishrobots is mocking conspiracy nut explanations in a particular way, he must have experienced them and interpreted them in a particular way. Ergo, no actual examples are needed, we can already deduce what happened from amishrobots' parody post.
I see no explanations - just assertions. But if as you say they are nuts, no explanation that is an explanation will be forthcoming.
I mean how else do you reasonably interpret something which is as you say NUTS.

User avatar
melkobukva
Posts: 322
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2018 6:35 pm

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by melkobukva » Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:13 am

jliat wrote:
Sun Nov 04, 2018 9:49 am
melkobukva wrote:
Sun Nov 04, 2018 9:29 am
jliat wrote:
Sun Nov 04, 2018 8:58 am


I must have missed where this happened? Could you link- repost?
Since amishrobots is mocking conspiracy nut explanations in a particular way, he must have experienced them and interpreted them in a particular way. Ergo, no actual examples are needed, we can already deduce what happened from amishrobots' parody post.
I see no explanations - just assertions. But if as you say they are nuts, no explanation that is an explanation will be forthcoming.
I mean how else do you reasonably interpret something which is as you say NUTS.
I have quite a lot of experience with conspiracy theories. The good ones are unconventional but reasonable interpretations of well founded facts - those are very useful, even when false. The bad ones are just gibberish, and they exist specifically to discredit the good ones. "If you ask too many questions about 9/11, you're an alien-chasing astral-projecting loon".

User avatar
jliat
Posts: 2692
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by jliat » Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:26 am

melkobukva wrote:
Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:13 am
I have quite a lot of experience with conspiracy theories.
Great, give us your experienced views on the conspiracy theories here, the world order being led by dark forces, the conspiracy of main stream science to protect their jobs etc. Pyramid power, global warming hoax, vaccine hoax.. Oh - the Holocaust denials from Warlock, Basically Warlocks and Darics.

User avatar
melkobukva
Posts: 322
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2018 6:35 pm

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by melkobukva » Sun Nov 04, 2018 11:04 am

jliat wrote:
Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:26 am
melkobukva wrote:
Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:13 am
I have quite a lot of experience with conspiracy theories.
Great, give us your experienced views on the conspiracy theories here, the world order being led by dark forces, the conspiracy of main stream science to protect their jobs etc. Pyramid power, global warming hoax, vaccine hoax.. Oh - the Holocaust denials from Warlock, Basically Warlocks and Darics.
http://www.readersdigest.com.au/true-st ... ut-be-true

User avatar
jliat
Posts: 2692
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by jliat » Sun Nov 04, 2018 11:12 am

melkobukva wrote:
Sun Nov 04, 2018 11:04 am
jliat wrote:
Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:26 am
melkobukva wrote:
Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:13 am
I have quite a lot of experience with conspiracy theories.
Great, give us your experienced views on the conspiracy theories here, the world order being led by dark forces, the conspiracy of main stream science to protect their jobs etc. Pyramid power, global warming hoax, vaccine hoax.. Oh - the Holocaust denials from Warlock, Basically Warlocks and Darics.
http://www.readersdigest.com.au/true-st ... ut-be-true
So your experience is reading Readers Digest articles? How does that relate to "the world order being led by dark forces, the conspiracy of main stream science to protect their jobs etc. Pyramid power, global warming hoax, vaccine hoax.. - the Holocaust denials.." you imply they too might be true?

User avatar
melkobukva
Posts: 322
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2018 6:35 pm

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by melkobukva » Sun Nov 04, 2018 11:26 am

jliat wrote:
Sun Nov 04, 2018 11:12 am
melkobukva wrote:
Sun Nov 04, 2018 11:04 am
jliat wrote:
Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:26 am


Great, give us your experienced views on the conspiracy theories here, the world order being led by dark forces, the conspiracy of main stream science to protect their jobs etc. Pyramid power, global warming hoax, vaccine hoax.. Oh - the Holocaust denials from Warlock, Basically Warlocks and Darics.
http://www.readersdigest.com.au/true-st ... ut-be-true
So your experience is reading Readers Digest articles? How does that relate to "the world order being led by dark forces, the conspiracy of main stream science to protect their jobs etc. Pyramid power, global warming hoax, vaccine hoax.. - the Holocaust denials.." you imply they too might be true?
Trying to find some common ground here. To have a debate, we need first to agree on at least something. This is why I linked to a respectable (?) outlet where some former 'conspiracy theories' are actually confirmed to be true. This demonstrates that being a 'conspiracy theory' is not a reliable marker of nuttiness.

User avatar
WhiteWarlock
Posts: 1776
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:58 am

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by WhiteWarlock » Sun Nov 04, 2018 11:52 am

don't hold a powered microwave transmitter to your head for too long... obsessively
tried telling people that since the early 90s
5G waves will be even worse health hazard
exponentially faster new smart phone internet speeds... for fucking idiots

User avatar
jliat
Posts: 2692
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: Attention Conspiracy Dorks:

Post by jliat » Mon Nov 05, 2018 12:53 am

melkobukva wrote:
Sun Nov 04, 2018 11:26 am

Trying to find some common ground here. To have a debate, we need first to agree on at least something. This is why I linked to a respectable (?) outlet where some former 'conspiracy theories' are actually confirmed to be true. This demonstrates that being a 'conspiracy theory' is not a reliable marker of nuttiness.
The link wasn't respectable, and you know that. As for the theories there most were hardly conspiracy theories but cover ups. I.E. not known at the time to anyone. Number 10 was a joke. That the FBI investigated Lennon... he was had problems with US authorities, drugs and politics... there was a REAL conspiracy theory that he was dead. In which "evidence" from the LP covers was used.

If you want a debate google this. Posting a link that shows they are true is no way to begin with 'agreement'. Or open a debate, again you are well aware of that.

I'm happy to go with the wiki as a starter, and note that when Warlock cited a wiki entry in support of his "theory" (jewish bankers backed the Bolsheviks) once it was pointed out the article said opposite, he declared "proving how Wikipedia is now part of Big Tech political agenda...for re-writing anything that is historically/scientifically inconvenient thus controlling social narrative" - a trait very indicative of a conspiracy theorist.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests