Given this then how can anything be maintained if this is true?“Wal Thornhill” wrote:
The consequences and possibilities in an ELECTRIC UNIVERSE® are far-reaching. First we must acknowledge our profound ignorance!
If one knows nothing of the origin of the universe one can not affirm anything- such as there was or was not a big bang. Simple logic.“Wal Thornhill” wrote: We know nothing of the origin of the universe. There was no Big Bang.
No evidence – and megaliths clearly show alignments to stars which are now in different positions.“Wal Thornhill” wrote:
The visible universe is static and much smaller than we thought.
The earth is not static, or is the sun, or Galaxy. The former is as obvious as night and day!
Then another contradiction – if it is true that Thornhill et al have “profound ignorance” then true they can have no idea of the “extent of the universe”, but it follows that they can't then propose“Wal Thornhill” wrote: We have no idea of the age or extent of the universe.
“The visible universe is … much smaller than we thought.”
True – given “profound ignorance”...“Wal Thornhill” wrote: We don’t know the ultimate source of the electrical energy or matter that forms the universe.
Then it follows the universe is not “ static”... and obviously this contradictory claim also contradicts the claim to “profound ignorance”...“Wal Thornhill” wrote:
Galaxies are shaped by electrical forces and form plasma focuses at their centers, which periodically eject quasars and jets of electrons.
My emphasis – evolve contradicts stasis!“Wal Thornhill” wrote: Quasars evolve into companion galaxies.
Not static then. “ identifiable” - how can the 'profoundly ignorant' identify?“Wal Thornhill” wrote:
Galaxies form families with identifiable “parents” and “children”.
'profoundly ignorant' conclusion – moreover given a “static” universe how can transformation tale place?“Wal Thornhill” wrote: Stars are electrical “transformers” not thermonuclear devices.
More evidence of Thornhill's opening assertion - “ profound ignorance”“Wal Thornhill” wrote:
There are no neutron stars or Black Holes. We don’t know the age of stars because the thermonuclear evolution theory does not apply to them. Supernovae are totally inadequate as a source of heavy elements. We do not know the age of the Earth because radioactive clocks can be upset by powerful electric discharges.
“We know nothing of the origin of the universe.” but the above claims just such knowledge. Yet another contradiction. give birth” ….!“Wal Thornhill” wrote: The powerful electric discharges that form a stellar photosphere create the heavy elements that appear in their spectra. Stars “give birth” electrically to companion stars and gas giant planets.
Brown Dwarf stars - “Habitability for hypothetical planets orbiting brown dwarfs has been studied. Computer models suggesting conditions for these bodies to have habitable planets are very stringent, the habitable zone being narrow and decreasing with time,”“Wal Thornhill” wrote:
Life is most likely to form inside the radiant plasma envelope of a brown dwarf star! Our Sun has gained new planets, including the Earth. That accounts for the “fruit-salad” of their characteristics. It is not the most hospitable place for life since small changes in the distant Sun could freeze or sterilize the Earth.
“profound ignorance” - certainly time is not universal...“Wal Thornhill” wrote: Planetary surfaces and atmospheres are deposited during their birth from a larger body and during electrical encounters with other planets. Planetary surfaces bear the electrical scars of such cosmic events. The speed of light is not a barrier. Real-time communication over galactic distances may be possible. Therefore time is universal and time travel is impossible. Anti-gravity is possible. Space has no extra dimensions in which to warp or where parallel universes may exist. There is no “zero-point” vacuum energy. The invisible energy source in space is electrical.
as I write in 12:12, and elsewhere it is early morning or late evening.
“profound ignorance”“Wal Thornhill” wrote:
Clean nuclear power is available from resonant catalytic nuclear systems. Higher energy is available from resonant catalytic chemical systems than in the usual chemical reactions. Biological enzymes are capable of utilizing resonant nuclear catalysis to transmute elements. Biological systems show evidence of communicating via resonant chemical systems, which may lend a physical explanation to the work of Rupert Sheldrake.
“profound ignorance” - Thornhill is not a biologist.“Wal Thornhill” wrote: DNA does not hold the key to life but is more like a blueprint for a set of components and tools in a factory.
“Wal Thornhill” wrote:
We may never be able to read the human genome and tell whether it represents a creature with two legs or six because the information that controls the assembly line is external to the DNA. There is more to life than chemistry.
he breakthrough could help inform population genetics and forensic science studies by allowing for predictions of hair colour, to a certain degree of accuracy, from DNA evidence alone.
On the basis of “ profound ignorance” QED.“Wal Thornhill” wrote: We are not hopelessly isolated in time and space on a tiny rock, orbiting an insignificant star in an insignificant galaxy. We are hopefully connected with the power and intelligence of the universe.