the pyramid: stairway to heaven

"Don't post anything racist/misogynistic/pornographic, loli images, or any animated GIFs and you should be fine, haha!" The Raytownian

Moderator: xome


killing raven sun
Posts: 1020
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:01 pm

Re: the pyramid: stairway to heaven

Post by killing raven sun » Sun Sep 16, 2018 4:01 pm

jliat wrote:
Sun Sep 16, 2018 8:45 am
lets try to change the subject from me.
james, you come here to make it about you, you cant help but post to my threads even though you admit you dont understand or care about the subject, so if you dont want to be the subject then dont post, pretty simple

i mean seriously, you actually have some gear knowledge, why not go there and be useful, if you arent here to just be a dick then why not help out a little? your little doggy routine is really unseemly

User avatar
jliat
Posts: 2772
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: the pyramid: stairway to heaven

Post by jliat » Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:11 am

killing raven sun wrote:
Sun Sep 16, 2018 4:01 pm
jliat wrote:
Sun Sep 16, 2018 8:45 am
lets try to change the subject from me.
james, you come here to make it about you,
No I post when people like you - whitewarlock post nonsense, some of which is dangerous. Holocaust denial, vaccination denial, and others. You like whitewarlock are probably tolerated at home, and ignored here. I choose not to. Then like white warlock you cant take criticism so become very insulting of the person making it, being unable to argue through lack of facts, inability to distinguish science from pseudo science and the ability to construct an argument. And what appears to be a pathological belief in what you think.
killing raven sun wrote:
Sun Sep 16, 2018 4:01 pm
you cant help but post to my threads even though you admit you dont understand or care about the subject,
That's a very odd twisting of something I wrote regarding you, the thuderbolts people and myself not being able to do the advanced maths of modern cosmology and Quantum mechanics. Your threads are like white warlocks mostly just links to conspiracy theorists who can only get their work into the public domain via youtube. Only he posts far more than you.
killing raven sun wrote:
Sun Sep 16, 2018 4:01 pm

so if you dont want to be the subject then dont post, pretty simple
Which is a thinly disguised threat that anyone challenging your posts will be personally attacked. Which is pretty simple.
killing raven sun wrote:
Sun Sep 16, 2018 4:01 pm

i mean seriously, you actually have some gear knowledge, why not go there and be useful, if you arent here to just be a dick then why not help out a little? your little doggy routine is really unseemly
So you haven't been serious up to now! And if you dont like the unseemliness - post about the argument not the person. Remember what a ad hominem is?

User avatar
jliat
Posts: 2772
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: the pyramid: stairway to heaven

Post by jliat » Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:25 am

WhiteWarlock wrote:
Sun Sep 16, 2018 1:35 pm
you are "The Fake"
the results from our network E-verify system
no wonder you breed so much animosity....
why don't you go find a better way for "fucking off"
seriously
Jim you are almost out of time
what have you accomplished
anything of real merit?
Again the subject is me! OK you think i'm a fake - animosity - sure - some people dont like their preconceptions challenged.
Like you and this Pyramid stuff, the nonsense about Hitler and the misreading, twisting, fabricating etc by the holocaust deniers, remember the video you posted, even the guy who made it finally confessed he was wrong about the gas chambers. See - i'm writing not about you or myself, but the nonsense you put here. Now like Daric you get very insulting...

Actually i've accomplished far more than i would have thought possible. But here we go again, you say i've accomplished nothing, i post examples, you reply i'm attention seeking ego tripper.

killing raven sun
Posts: 1020
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:01 pm

Re: the pyramid: stairway to heaven

Post by killing raven sun » Mon Sep 17, 2018 4:29 am

jliat wrote:
Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:11 am
killing raven sun wrote:
Sun Sep 16, 2018 4:01 pm
jliat wrote:
Sun Sep 16, 2018 8:45 am
lets try to change the subject from me.
james, you come here to make it about you,
No I post when people like you - whitewarlock post nonsense, some of which is dangerous. Holocaust denial, vaccination denial, and others.
realize that nobody here gives a shit about your demented opinion, you freely admit you know nothing of science so your posting is just because you are a troll, here you are once again making this about you, as if you are some guardian of the knowledges, no, you are a dipshit clown
jliat wrote:
Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:11 am
You like whitewarlock are probably tolerated at home, and ignored here. I choose not to.
well then, these threads will continue to be about you james, do you see how you are egotistically
making this thread about you and your misunderstanding of science? you still think the universe isnt electric even when i post overwhelming evidence, at this point all you have illustrated is that you are a loser
jliat wrote:
Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:11 am
Then like white warlock you cant take criticism so become very insulting of the person making it,
your insults arent criticism, get over yourself
jliat wrote:
Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:11 am
being unable to argue through lack of facts, inability to distinguish science from pseudo science and the ability to construct an argument. And what appears to be a pathological belief in what you think.
...descibes you perfectly, you dont even know the universe is fundamentally electric and that literally every scientist agrees with me, prove me wrong troll
jliat wrote:
Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:11 am
killing raven sun wrote:
Sun Sep 16, 2018 4:01 pm
you cant help but post to my threads even though you admit you dont understand or care about the subject,
That's a very odd twisting of something I wrote regarding you, the thuderbolts people and myself not being able to do the advanced maths of modern cosmology and Quantum mechanics.
no, you admit frequently that you dont really care about the truth of a subject, you dont even believe in truth, you accept that you cant know anything, you are resigned to being a stupid troll
jliat wrote:
Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:11 am
Your threads are like white warlocks mostly just links to conspiracy theorists who can only get their work into the public domain via youtube. Only he posts far more than you.
james, more positing as if you understand science, you are very conflicted, why do you constantly contradict yourself? if you dont understand science, which you dont james, then your opinion about conspiracy theories is worthless
jliat wrote:
Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:11 am
killing raven sun wrote:
Sun Sep 16, 2018 4:01 pm
so if you dont want to be the subject then dont post, pretty simple
Which is a thinly disguised threat that anyone challenging your posts will be personally attacked.
nope, others get measured explanations, you are a dumb fuck troll who deserves nothing but scorn
killing raven sun wrote:
Sun Sep 16, 2018 6:51 am
you dont have any choice but to come here and be my doggy, i own you

User avatar
jliat
Posts: 2772
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: the pyramid: stairway to heaven

Post by jliat » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:07 am

killing raven sun wrote:
Mon Sep 17, 2018 4:29 am
jliat wrote:
Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:11 am
killing raven sun wrote:
Sun Sep 16, 2018 4:01 pm

james, you come here to make it about you,
No I post when people like you - whitewarlock post nonsense, some of which is dangerous. Holocaust denial, vaccination denial, and others.
realize that nobody here gives a shit about your demented opinion, you freely admit you know nothing of science so your posting is just because you are a troll, here you are once again making this about you, as if you are some guardian of the knowledges, no, you are a dipshit clown
No - you and warlock give a huge shit. I do not freely admit I know nothing about science, I freely admit I do not know better than those who are actually engaged in doing science. Unlike yourself and Warlock who claim expertise in almost everything, though based on YouTube videos.
killing raven sun wrote:
Mon Sep 17, 2018 4:29 am
jliat wrote:
Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:11 am
You like whitewarlock are probably tolerated at home, and ignored here. I choose not to.
well then, these threads will continue to be about you james, do you see how you are egotistically
making this thread about you and your misunderstanding of science? you still think the universe isnt electric even when i post overwhelming evidence, at this point all you have illustrated is that you are a loser
A video or two made by a fringe group banned from wiki they are so out of touch with the mainstream science. That may convince you, but not many others. So no- no overwhelming evidence. And no real science - pseudo science. If you want to make these threads about me, fine, id rather not, but it shows that you do give a shit. So you're contradicting your own opening remark.
killing raven sun wrote:
Mon Sep 17, 2018 4:29 am
jliat wrote:
Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:11 am
Then like white warlock you cant take criticism so become very insulting of the person making it,
your insults arent criticism, get over yourself
My insults- I've not made any.
killing raven sun wrote:
Mon Sep 17, 2018 4:29 am
jliat wrote:
Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:11 am
being unable to argue through lack of facts, inability to distinguish science from pseudo science and the ability to construct an argument. And what appears to be a pathological belief in what you think.
...descibes you perfectly, you dont even know the universe is fundamentally electric and that literally every scientist agrees with me, prove me wrong troll
I have done. The electric universe can only support itself, has no following amongst the major universities, never published in respected peer reviewed papers, and is thrown out of wiki for being hogwash. Those in Thunderbolts -
The Thunderbolts Project is primarily a volunteer-run organization, supported by private donations...

The last 100 years are replete with examples illustrating the failure of the scientific method to produce realistic answers....

Sadly, scientists themselves are not nearly so magnanimous or scrupulously honest....

In short, the reality is that apart from the stars that lie fewer than 1000 light years radius of Earth, astrophysics has no accurate, verifiable measure of distance based upon a known benchmark value, with the appalling implication for cosmology that at this time, the structure, extent, and age of the Universe are impossible to determine with precision or certainty....

A very good example is the widely used standard text for honours students in space science, the three-volume Introduction to Stellar Astrophysics by Erika Böhm-Vitense. Out of 19 sections in volume one on basic stellar observations, there is a single 5-page treatment of stellar magnetism. There is no mention of electricity or plasma.
Similarly, the classic 700-page text, Principles of Physical Cosmology by P. J. E. “Jim” Peebles, is arguably the most widely referenced resource in the formal study of cosmology. It demonstrates scant regard for electricity and magnetism in the cosmos....

Because astronomers are incredibly short of training in plasma and electricity, it is therefore quite understandable that their expressed opinions in these fields are generally misinformed....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MslBth2SQfM
killing raven sun wrote:
Sun Sep 16, 2018 4:01 pm
you cant help but post to my threads even though you admit you dont understand or care about the subject,
jliat wrote:
Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:11 am
That's a very odd twisting of something I wrote regarding you, the thuderbolts people and myself not being able to do the advanced maths of modern cosmology and Quantum mechanics.
no, you admit frequently that you dont really care about the truth of a subject, you dont even believe in truth, you accept that you cant know anything, you are resigned to being a stupid troll
I freely admit no such thing.
Other than i'm not a qualified working scientist. Neither are you or the people at Thunderbolts "a volunteer-run organization," rejected by mainstream science. And openly admits it is - unlike you. Odd.
killing raven sun wrote:
Sun Sep 16, 2018 4:01 pm
jliat wrote:
Mon Sep 17, 2018 12:11 am
Your threads are like white warlocks mostly just links to conspiracy theorists who can only get their work into the public domain via youtube. Only he posts far more than you.
james, more positing as if you understand science,
Yes - because I do, its called 'The philosophy of Science' and its subject is 'Science'. Unlike I the sciences, they have subjects like biology, or astronomy. So in The philosophy of science the nature of 'scientific' propositions, its methods etc are analysed. And that is where the idea of Pseudo science arises. Not within any particular science.
killing raven sun wrote:
Sun Sep 16, 2018 4:01 pm
you are very conflicted, why do you constantly contradict yourself?
I don't - you have to edit and make claims to do that. But if you want a good example of contradiction you begin this post by saying..
'nobody here gives a shit about your demented opinion' - then go on and on about what you think this is. A clear example of you contradicting yourself.
killing raven sun wrote:
Sun Sep 16, 2018 4:01 pm
if you dont understand science, which you dont james, then your opinion about conspiracy theories is worthless
As I do it isn't worthless. But actually its not 'my' opinion so it isn't worthless if i'm citing it or not.
killing raven sun wrote:
Sun Sep 16, 2018 4:01 pm

nope, others get measured explanations, you are a dumb fuck troll who deserves nothing but scorn
Then do just that, and dont present arguments. Then i wont reply.

killing raven sun
Posts: 1020
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:01 pm

Re: the pyramid: stairway to heaven

Post by killing raven sun » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:22 am

jliat wrote:
Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:07 am
The electric universe can only support itself, has no following amongst the major universities, never published in respected peer reviewed papers, and is thrown out of wiki for being hogwash.
killing raven sun wrote:
Wed Sep 12, 2018 12:33 pm
https://eos.org/editors-vox/electric-cu ... n-the-show
Modern society relies on electric currents. We can generate them, guide them from one place to another (including very remote places), and make them work for us. The use of electricity has provided the greatest technological advances in humankind. But electric currents also occur in nature by themselves and “run the show” in outer space.

Electric Currents in Geospace and Beyond, a new book just published by the American Geophysical Union, explores our most up-to-date understanding of electric currents in the solar system. Here the editors answer some questions about past and recent advances in this field.

How and when were electric currents in space discovered?

Already in 1779, the American scientist, inventor and politician, Benjamin Franklin, spoke of a “quantity of electricity” in the atmosphere causing the aurora borealis.

Much later, in 1908, the Norwegian pioneer of space physics, Kristian Birkeland, laid out a first theory of electric currents reaching out to space.

All this happened long before the advent of the space age, when the first in situ evidence for the existence of space currents was obtained using satellites in the 1960s.

It is now understood that outer space is fundamentally electrical in nature.


here, i quoted the entire AGU wiki for you...
wiki wrote:Banner logo
Wiki Loves Monuments: The world's largest photography competition is now open! Photograph a historic site, learn more about our history, and win prizes.

Hide
Open main menu
Wikipedia
Search Wikipedia
EditWatch this pageRead in another language
American Geophysical Union
The American Geophysical Union (AGU) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization of geophysicists, consisting of over 62,000 members from 144 countries. AGU's activities are focused on the organization and dissemination of scientific information in the interdisciplinary and international field of geophysics. The geophysical sciences involve four fundamental areas: atmospheric and ocean sciences; solid-Earth sciences; hydrologic sciences; and space sciences. The organization's headquarters is located on Florida Avenue in Washington, D.C.[9]

American Geophysical Union
Logo of American Geophysical Union
American Geophysical Union building, front entrance.jpg
Front entrance to AGU building
Abbreviation
AGU
Motto
Unselfish cooperation in research[1]
Formation
1919; 99 years ago
Type
Scientific society
Tax ID no.
52-0955532[2]
Legal status
501(c)(3) non-profit[3]
Purpose
Geophysics, and many other fields in Earth and Space sciences
Headquarters
Washington, D.C., United States
Coordinates
38°54′53.1″N 77°02′43.4″W
Region served
Worldwide
Services
Galvanizes a community of earth and space scientists that collaboratively advances and communicates science and its power to ensure a sustainable future.[2]
Membership
62,000 individuals
President
Margaret Leinen[4]
Executive Director, Chief Executive Officer
Christine McEntee[5]
Main organ
Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union
Affiliations
International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics, American Association for the Advancement of Science,[6] American Institute of Physics,[7] National Academy of Sciences, American Geological Institute, Council of Engineering and Scientific Society Executives, International Council of Scientific Unions[8]
Revenue (2014)
$36,839,802[2]
Expenses (2014)
$32,540,058[2]
Endowment
$602,625[2]
Employees (2014)
140[2]
Volunteers (2014)
21,000[2]
Website
www.agu.org
Contents
History Edit
The AGU was established in December 1919 by the National Research Council (NRC) to represent the United States in the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG), and its first chairman was William Bowie of the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey (USCGS).[10][11]:267 For more than 50 years, it operated as an unincorporated affiliate of the National Academy of Sciences. On June 29, 1972, AGU was incorporated in the District of Columbia[12] and membership was opened to scientists and students worldwide.[13][14]

The AGU was intended to promote "pure" geophysics; exploration geophysics has its own society, the Society of Exploration Geophysicists.[14] In a March 1919 report by a committee chaired by Robert S. Woodward of the Carnegie Institution, geophysics was defined as a collection of "borderlands" (closely related, mutually dependent subjects): astronomy, geodesy, geology, meteorology, mareology (oceanography), seismology, terrestrial magnetism, terrestrial electricity, tides, and volcanology. The AGU was organized under seven sections: Geodesy, Seismology, Meteorology, Terrestrial magnetism and electricity, Oceanography, Volcanology, and Geophysical chemistry. Hydrology was added in 1930 and Tectonophysics in 1940. In suggesting the latter name, Norman Bowen evoked a familiar theme: to "designate this new borderline field between geophysics, physics and geology ... for the solution of problems of tectonics."[15]

The first meeting of the AGU took place on April 23, 1920. In attendance were 25 members. Up to 1930, the number of members was restricted and members were elected. In 1932 the first annual dues of US$2 were imposed.[15] The membership grew to 4600 in 1950; 13,000 in 1980; and 26,000 in 1990.[14] As of 2013, it had 62,000 members from 144 countries.[16]

Publications Edit
Main category: American Geophysical Union academic journals
AGU publishes the weekly Eos newspaper and nineteen peer-reviewed scientific journals:[17]

Earth and Space Science
Earth's Future
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
GeoHealth
Geophysical Research Letters
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems (JAMES)
Journal of Geophysical Research
Atmospheres
Biogeosciences
Earth Surface
Oceans
Planets
Solid Earth
Space Physics
Paleoceanography
Radio Science
Reviews of Geophysics
Space Weather
Tectonics
Water Resources Research
The journal Radio Science is co-sponsored by the International Union of Radio Science.[18] The journal Earth Interactions is published in partnership with the American Meteorological Society (AMS) and the Association of American Geographers (AAG).[19][20] In addition, International Journal of Geomagnetism and Aeronomy is no longer published and AGU distributes Chinese Journal of Geophysics and Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics.[17] Many of the journals have high impact factors, with Paleoceanography having the highest within paleontology and Reviews of Geophysics the second highest within geochemistry and geophysics as of 2010.[21] AGU has also been publishing books for more than 85 years.[22]

AGU co-published (along with the AMS and the AAG) its first electronic journal, Earth Interactions, in 1997. It started its own electronic journal, Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, in December 1999.[23] It made a full transition to electronic publishing in 2001. For all its journals, the electronic version became the publication of record. This was accompanied by a new identification scheme for articles that entirely did away with sequential page numbers. Instead, each article had a digital object identifier (DOI). As an example, 10.1029/2001GL014304 consists of the publisher identifier (AGU), the year (2001), the journal code (GL), and an article number (014304). This new system was met with complaints from libraries and scientists. The article numbers provided no clue for libraries to find an article in printed versions, and even scientific databases were not set up to handle DOIs. AGU officials claimed that the problems were a temporary cost of being a frontrunner, but did retroactively assign each article a four-digit article number.[24]

In 2012 the journals and books, including over one and a half million pages of legacy content, were transferred to the Wiley Online Library. John Wiley & Sons were recognized for this work with the IT Project Team of the Year Award at the UK IT Industry Awards for 2013.[25][26][27]

While some AGU journals are fully open access by default, the remainder are fully open only after a two-year rolling embargo.[28]

The AGU hosts a number of blogs, collectively known as the AGU Blogosphere, informally publishing frequent updates on the Earth and space sciences.[29]

Texaco copyright case Edit
Main article: American Geophysical Union v. Texaco
AGU publications are copyrighted, but in the United States many exceptions to the exclusive rights of copyright are allowed under the fair use provision, part of the Copyright Act of 1976. Making copies of publications are allowed for such uses as teaching and research as long as a set of four criteria are met. However, when Texaco's corporate library made systematic copies of journal articles for its collection, AGU and five other publishers took Texaco to court. The judges found for AGU. Texaco was fined and agreed to retroactively purchase a license from the Copyright Clearance Center.[30][31][32]

Executive Edit
Presidents Edit
Main article: List of presidents of the American Geophysical Union

William Bowie, first chairman of the AGU.
The presidents of the AGU have been:[8][15]

William Bowie (1920–1922)
Louis Agricola Bauer (1922–1924)
Harry F. Reid (1924–1926)
Henry S. Washington (1926–1928)
William Bowie (1929–1932)
William Jackson Humphreys (1932–1935)
Nicholas H. Heck (1935–1938)
Richard M. Field (1938–1941)
Walter C. Lowdermilk (1941–1944)
Leason H. Adams (1944–1947)
Oscar Edward Meinzer (1947–1948)
Walter Hermann Bucher (1948–1953)
James B. Macelwane (1953–1956)
Maurice Ewing (1956–1959)
Lloyd V. Berkner (1959–1961)
Thomas F. Malone (1961–1964)
George P. Woollard (1964–1966)
William C. Ackermann (1966–1968)
Helmut Landsberg (1968–1970)
Homer E. Newell, Jr. (1970–1972)
Philip H. Abelson (1972–1974)
Frank Press (1974–1976)
Arthur E. Maxwell (1976–1978)
Allan V. Cox (1978–1980)
John T. Wilson (1980–1982)
James Van Allen (1982–1984)
Charles L. Drake (1984–1986)
Peter S. Eagleson (1986–1988)
Don L. Anderson (1988–1990)
Brent Dalrymple (1990–1992)
Ralph J. Cicerone (1992–1994)
Marcia Neugebauer (1994–1996)
Sean Solomon (1996–1998)
John A. Knauss (1998–2000)
Marcia McNutt (2000–2002)
Robert E. Dickenson (2002–2004)
John A. Orcutt (2004–2006)
Tim Killeen (2006–2008)
Tim Grove (2008–2010)
Mike McPhaden (2010–2013)
Carol Finn (2013–2014)
Margaret Leinen (2015–2016)
Eric Davidson (2016–present)
Executive directors Edit
While more than 40 presidents have provided scientific leadership for the AGU since 1919, operational leadership has been provided by just four individuals. The first was John Adam Fleming, who was elected Secretary in 1925 and changed the name of his position to General Secretary. He served as a volunteer while working at the Department of Terrestrial Magnetism at the Carnegie Institution. By 1943, with the membership nearing 2,000, AGU recognized the need for a full-time professional administrator. The post was renamed Executive Secretary and Waldo E. Smith was hired. He served until 1970 and then Athelstan Spilhaus, Jr. was hired as Executive Director.[15][33] Christine McEntee replaced him in 2010.[8] Medals have been named after Fleming and Smith.[15]

Recognition Edit
Medals Edit
The AGU offers several medals and awards.[34] Its highest honor is the William Bowie Medal, and its namesake was the first recipient in 1939. It is awarded at most annually for "outstanding contributions to fundamental geophysics and for unselfish cooperation in research". Other medals include:[35]

The Walter H. Bucher Medal (established 1966), named after Walter Hermann Bucher, a former AGU president and major contributor to crustal problems, “for original contributions to the basic knowledge of the crust and lithosphere.”
The Maurice Ewing Medal (established 1974 and co-sponsored by the United States Navy), named after Maurice Ewing, a major contributor to oceanography, “for significant original contributions to the scientific understanding of the processes in the ocean; for the advancement of oceanographic engineering, technology, and instrumentation; and for outstanding service to the marine sciences.”
The John Adam Fleming Medal (established 1960), named after John Adam Fleming, a major contributor to magnetic standards and measurements, “for original research and technical leadership in geomagnetism, atmospheric electricity, aeronomy, space physics, and related sciences.”
The Harry H. Hess Medal (established 1984), named after Harry Hammond Hess, who made major contributions to the study of the oceanic lithosphere, “for outstanding achievements in research of the constitution and evolution of Earth and other planets”
The Robert E. Horton Medal (established 1974), named after Robert E. Horton, who provided many of the analytical concepts for understanding the hydrologic cycle, “for outstanding contributions to hydrology.”
The Inge Lehmann Medal (established 1995), named after Inge Lehmann, the discoverer of the Earth's inner core, “for outstanding contributions to the understanding of the structure, composition, and dynamics of the Earth’s mantle and core.”
The James B. Macelwane Medal (established 1961), named after James B. Macelwane, a former AGU president who was deeply interested in teaching young scientists, "to be awarded annually for significant contributions by outstanding young scientists." Recipients must be no more than 10 years past their highest degree.
The Roger Revelle Medal (established 1991), named after Roger Revelle, an oceanographer notable for his contribution to the understanding of global change, “for outstanding contributions in atmospheric sciences, atmosphere-ocean coupling, atmosphere-land coupling, biogeochemical cycles, climate, or related aspects of the Earth system”
The Waldo E. Smith Medal (established 1982), named after Waldo E. Smith, the first Executive Secretary of AGU, to recognize "individuals who have played unique leadership roles in such diverse areas as scientific associations, education, legislation, research, public understanding of science, management, and philanthropy, and whose accomplishments have greatly strengthened and helped advance the geophysical sciences."
The Charles A. Whitten Medal (established 1984), named after Charles A. Whitten, a former AGU General Secretary and geodesist, “for outstanding achievement in research on the form and dynamics of the Earth and planets.”
Awards Edit
The Robert C. Cowen Award (established 1991), named after a long-time editor of The Christian Science Monitor, "for a journalist or a group that has made significant, lasting, and consistent contributions to accurate reporting or writing on the geophysical sciences for the general public."
The Excellence in Geophysical Education Award (established in 1995) “to acknowledge a sustained commitment to excellence in geophysical education by a team, individual, or group. To educators who have had a major impact on geophysical education at any level (kindergarten through postgraduate), who have been outstanding teachers and trainers for a number of years, or who have made a long-lasting, positive impact on geophysical education through professional service.”
The Charles S. Falkenberg Award (established in 2002), named after Falkenberg, who applied data visualization and information technology to earth sciences, to an individual “scientist under 45 years of age who has contributed to the quality of life, economic opportunities, and stewardship of the planet through the use of Earth science information and to the public awareness of the importance of understanding our planet.”
The Edward A. Flinn III Award (established 1990), named after a leader of the NASA Geodynamics Program who directed efforts to detect motion of the Earth's crust using laser ranging, to an “individual who personifies the Union’s motto ‘unselfish cooperation in research’ through their facilitating, coordinating, and implementing activities.”
The International Award (established 2007) “to recognize an individual scientist or a small team for making an outstanding contribution to furthering the Earth and space sciences and using science for the benefit of society in less favored nations.”
The David Perlman Award (established 2000), named after the science editor of the San Francisco Chronicle, "for excellence in researching and reporting a news story that meets one or more of the following criteria: brings new information or concepts about AGU sciences to the public's attention, identifies and corrects misconceptions about AGU sciences, or makes AGU sciences accessible and interesting to general audiences, without sacrificing accuracy."
The Athelstan Spilhaus Award (established 2006), named after Athelstan Frederick Spilhaus, Sr. who created the bathythermograph and also a long-running science cartoon, “for enhancement of the public understanding of Earth and space science.”
The Science for Solutions Award (established 2012) "for significant contributions in the application and use of Earth and space sciences to solve societal problems."
The Climate Communication Award (established 2011 and funded by Nature's Own, a purveyor of fossils and minerals) “for the communication of climate science.”
The William Kaula Award (established 2003), named after geophysicist and physical geodesist William M. Kaula, for "extraordinary dedication to, and exceptional efforts on behalf of, the Union’s publications program." (Awarded on even-numbered years.)[36]
The Walter Sullivan Award for Excellence in Science Journalism (established 2000), named after the renowned science writer of The New York Times, awarded annually for science feature writing.[37]
Fellowships Edit
See also: Category:Fellows of the American Geophysical Union
AGU nominates members for fellowship in the society. According to the AGU website "To be elected a Fellow of AGU is a special tribute for those who have made exceptional scientific contributions to Earth and space sciences as valued by their peers and vetted by section and focus group committees."[38] A maximum of 0.1% of the membership can be elected each year.[39]

Sections and focus groups Edit
The AGU is divided into 11 sections that provide the main structure for managing volunteers, developing leaders and honoring scientists. These sections also reflect the breadth of science within Earth and space science: atmospheric sciences; biogeosciences; geodesy; geomagnetism, geohealth; paleomagnetism and electromagnetism; hydrology; ocean sciences; planetary sciences; seismology; space physics and aeronomy; tectonophysics; volcanology, geochemistry, and petrology.[40][41]

There are also 12 focus groups that organize research involving two or more sections. These are atmospheric and space electricity; cryosphere sciences; Earth and planetary surface processes; Earth and space science informatics; mineral and rock physics; global environmental change; natural hazards; near surface geophysics; nonlinear geophysics; paleoceanography and paleoclimatology; study of the Earth's deep interior; and societal impacts and policy sciences.[40]

Meetings Edit

Plenary session at an American Geophysical Union policy conference in Washington, DC in May 2012.
AGU holds annual meetings in San Francisco every December (known as the Fall meeting) and every Spring (April through May) in locations around the world. The latter grew out of AGU's annual Spring meeting, which had been held for many years in Baltimore, until declining interest caused AGU to move the meeting to different locations, starting with Boston in 1998. With the 2003 meeting in Nice, France, it became known as the Joint Assembly because AGU co-sponsors it with other societies such as the Geochemical Society, the Mineralogical Society of America (MSA), the Canadian Geophysical Union (CGU), and the European Geosciences Union (EGU). The Fall Meeting had more than 20,000 attendees in 2012.[42] Because of renovations at the San Francisco venue, the 2017 meeting took place in New Orleans and the 2018 meeting will be in Washington, DC.

In addition to the two meetings that cover all areas of the geophysical sciences, AGU sponsors many specialized meetings that are intended to serve the needs of particular scientific disciplines or geographical areas, including the Ocean Sciences Meetings and Western Pacific Geophysical Meetings which are held in even numbered years. Small, highly focused meetings are offered through the Chapman Conferences.[43]

The large numbers and international participation in the Fall Meeting results in a large contribution to greenhouse gases. The 9500 participants in the 2002 meeting traveled an average of 8,000 kilometres (5,000 mi) to attend, producing 1.3 metric tons of carbon dioxide, or one-sixteenth of the average yearly emissions for Americans. The AGU has made some adjustments such as asking shuttle bus drivers to turn off their engines when they are not moving, but 95% of the emissions come from jet fuel. In an unpublished study, David Scott and Lawrence Plug of Dalhousie University estimated that the AGU could reduce emissions by 7.7% if it moved the Fall Meeting to Denver, Colorado.[44][45]

Science and policy Edit
On occasion the AGU Council issues position statements on matters affecting public policy that are related to geophysics. These include biological evolution, natural hazards, science education and funding, and climate change.[46] The AGU adopted its first position statement on climate change in December 1998.[47] That statement began

Atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases have substantially increased as a consequence of fossil fuel combustion and other human activities. These elevated concentrations of greenhouse gases are predicted to persist in the atmosphere for times ranging to thousands of years. Increasing concentrations of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases affect the Earth-atmosphere energy balance, enhancing the natural greenhouse effect and thereby exerting a warming influence at the Earth's surface.[48]

The statement continued,

Present understanding of the Earth climate system provides a compelling basis for legitimate public concern over future global and regional-scale changes resulting from increased concentrations of greenhouse gases.[48]

After a discussion of scientific uncertainties the statement concluded

AGU believes that the present level of scientific uncertainty does not justify inaction in the mitigation of human induced climate change and/or the adaptation to it.[48]

The adopted position statement was backed up by a detailed supporting document.[49] The AGU position statement has undergone several revisions, most recently revised and reaffirmed in 2012.[50]

In 2011, AGU created a Task Force on Scientific Ethics, " to review and update existing policies and procedures for dealing with scientific misconduct."[51] This effort received a setback when its chairman, Peter Gleick, announced that he had lied to obtain internal documents from the Heartland Institute and then leaked them to the public.[52] Gleick, a climate scientist and recipient of the MacArthur Fellowship, said he was motivated by frustration with the efforts of groups such as the Heartland Institute to attack climate science and scientists, but admitted that it was a serious lapse of judgement.[53] He resigned from the task force on February 16, 2012, and was replaced by Linda Gundersen, director of the Office of Science Quality and Integrity at the United States Geological Survey (USGS).[51]

Members of the AGU who work in politically-controversial fields have come under legal attack. For example, Michael Mann, a Fellow of the AGU and lead author of the original "hockey stick graph" study, faced a legal demand to turn over his private emails from Kenneth Cuccinelli II, at the time the attorney general of the state of Virginia, a conservative Republican who argues that there is no persuasive evidence that human activity is warming the planet. The court rejected Cuccinelli's demand.[54] However, such legal challenges continue, so in 2012 AGU entered in a partnership with the Climate Science Legal Defense Fund to offer legal counseling at the Fall Meeting.[55]

Corporate sponsorship Edit
See also: ExxonMobil climate change controversy
In 2014, the AGU accepted 5469 gifts, grants and pledges from individuals and corporations. Of these, the 1919 Society (gifts of over $100,000) included ExxonMobil, Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Management International, and Nature's Own, along with 11 individuals.[56]:19 In addition, it has corporate sponsors for various programs. These include an annual Student Breakfast (supported by ExxonMobil); and Amazon Web Services supports research grants and offers access to its cloud computing resources.[56]:26–27 In 2015, the AGU Board approved a new Organizational Support Policy. The policy covers subjects such as advertorials and member surveys. It requires that partnerships contribute to AGU's mission, vision and goals and that the AGU "apply vetting to ascertain that partners are not engaged in false misinterpretations of science."[57]

The sponsorship of AGU by ExxonMobil became a source of concern for many members after evidence surfaced that ExxonMobil had known about climate change for decades but had actively worked to undermine climate science.[58][59][60][61] On February 22, 2016, a letter signed by 100 scientists was delivered to the AGU, requesting that they cut all ties with ExxonMobil and other companies that foster climate misinformation.[62][63][64] The AGU Board of Directors met on 22 April 2016 and voted to continue accepting sponsorship from ExxonMobil, arguing that there was not unequivocal evidence that ExxonMobil continues to participate in climate misinformation.[65] Instead of making a short-term political statement, the Board wished to engage with the energy industry over the long term.[66][67] In response, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse and Representative Ted Lieu sent a critical letter saying that ExxonMobil continues to fund climate denial and is misleading the AGU.[68] The Union of Concerned Scientists also sent a letter urging them to reconsider.[69] However, in a meeting on 23 September 2016, the Board upheld its previous decision.[70]

See also Edit
Geological Society of America
List of geoscience organizations
Scientific opinion on climate change
References Edit
"Leadership". Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. 73: 10–22. 1992. Bibcode:1992EOSTr..73...10.. doi:10.1029/EO073i49Sp00010.
"Form 990: Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax". American Geophysical Union. Guidestar. December 31, 2014.
Anonymous (2009). "Articles of Incorporation of the American Geophysical Union". Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. 90 (37): 326. Bibcode:2009EOSTr..90..326.. doi:10.1029/2009EO370004.
"President". American Geophysical Union. Accessed on April 13, 2016.
"Executive Director". American Geophysical Union. Accessed on April 13, 2016.
"Reports from CAIP Affiliates: American Geophysical Union". CAIP Annual Report 2001-2002. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved 22 November 2013.
"AGU affiliates with American Institute of Physics". Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. 52 (8): 610. 1971. Bibcode:1971EOSTr..52Q.610.. doi:10.1029/EO052i008p00610-01.
"Finding Aid to the American Geophysical Union records, 1919-2008". American Institute of Physics Niels Bohr Library & Archives. Retrieved 22 November 2013.
"AGU - American Geophysical Union". American Geophysical Union. Retrieved 2016-09-19.
Bauer, Louis A. (January 1924). "The organization and aims of the American Geophysical Union". Bulletin of the National Research Council. 7 (41): 7–18. Bibcode:1923TrAGU...4....7B. doi:10.1029/TR004i001p00007. Retrieved 17 October 2016.
Cochrane, Rexmond C. (1978). The National Academy of Sciences: The First Hundred Years, 1863-1963. National Academies. doi:10.17226/579.
"American Geophysical Union". District of Columbia Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs. Government of the District of Columbia. Accessed on April 13, 2016.
"AGU History". American Geophysical Union. Archived from the original on 6 June 2011. Retrieved 10 October 2016.
Doel, Ronald E. (2012). "American Geophysical Union". In Rothenberg, Marc. History of Science in the United States. Routledge. ISBN 9781135583187.
"AGU celebrates 80 years of leadership (1919–1999)" (PDF). American Geophysical Union. Retrieved 22 November 2013.
Brennan, Charlie (1 August 2013). "Boulder scientists draw top honors from American Geophysical Union". Daily Camera. Retrieved 22 November 2013.
"Journals". Publications. American Geophysical Union. Retrieved 25 November 2013.
"URSI-sponsored Journals". International Union of Radio Science. Retrieved 11 October 2016.
"Earth Interactions". www.ametsoc.org. American Meteorological Society. Retrieved 11 October 2016.
Winkler, Julie (29 May 2014). "'Earth Interactions' Journal Undergoes Recent Changes". AAG Newsletter. American Association of Geographers.
"Journal Citation Reports". Thompson Reuters. Archived from the original on 30 May 2013. Retrieved 10 October 2016.
Aldred, Maxine (2010). "New Imprint for AGU Books". Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. 91 (34): 299. Bibcode:2010EOSTr..91..299A. doi:10.1029/2010EO340004.
Holoviak, Judy C. (January 2001). "Scientific e-Journals". Geotimes. Retrieved 25 November 2013.
Renner, Rebecca (30 August 2002). "Online pioneer ends up lost in cyberspace" (PDF). Science. 297: 1468–1469. doi:10.1126/science.297.5586.1468. Retrieved 24 November 2013.
"American Geophysical Union and Wiley-Blackwell Announce Publishing Partnership" (Press release). Wiley. 18 July 2012. Retrieved 2013-11-23.
"Wiley Wins IT Project Team of the Year at the UK IT Industry Awards 2013" (Press release). Wiley. 21 November 2013. Retrieved 2013-11-23.
Anonymous (1994). "AGU on the move". Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. 75 (24): 265. Bibcode:1994EOSTr..75..256.. doi:10.1029/94EO00939.
"AGU offers free access to journal articles and open access publishing". AGU. Retrieved 5 October 2017.
"AGU Blogosphere". American Geophysical Union. 2014. Retrieved 2014-03-30.AGU Blogosphere
American Geophysical Union v. Texaco, Inc., 60 F.3d 913 (2d Cir 1995).
"Copyright & Photocopies". Copyright Clearance Cente. Retrieved 25 November 2013.
Harper, Georgia. "Professional fair use after Texaco". building on others' creative expression. University of Texas Libraries. Retrieved 25 November 2013.
Newell, H. E. (1984). "Waldo E. Smith: A quarter century of service". History of geophysics. 1: 144. Bibcode:1984HGeo....1..144N. doi:10.1029/HG001p0144. Retrieved 23 November 2013.
"Union Awards, Medals & Prizes". American Geophysical Union. Retrieved 10 October 2016.
"Medals". Honors program. American Geophysical Union. Retrieved 26 November 2013.
"Kaula award". Publications. American Geophysical Union. Retrieved 26 November 2013.
"Walter Sullivan Award". Honors Program. American Geophysical Union. Retrieved 26 November 2013.
"Union Fellows". American Geophysical Union. Retrieved 10 October 2016.
"Nomination Process". Honors Program. 3 August 2016. Retrieved 11 October 2016.
"Sections/Focus Groups". American Geophysical Union. Retrieved 10 October 2016.
"Mission". GeoHealthConnect. American Geophysical Union. Retrieved 13 March 2018.
"AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco, 3-7 December 2012". American Geophysical Union. Retrieved August 8, 2013.
"Meetings". American Geophysical Union. Archived from the original on 8 July 2011.
Mason, Betsy (11 December 2003). "Scientists contribute to greenhouse-gas emissions". Nature News. doi:10.1038/news031208-13. Retrieved 24 November 2013.
Lester, B. (5 October 2007). "Greening the Meeting". Science. 318 (5847): 36–38. doi:10.1126/science.318.5847.36.
"AGU Position Statements and Letters". Science policy. American Geophysical Union. Retrieved 23 November 2013.
"AGU adopts position statement on climate change and greenhouse gases". FYI: The AIP Bulletin of Science Policy News. American Institute of Physics. 29 January 1999. Retrieved 10 October 2016.
Anonymous (28 September 1999). "Position statement on climate change and greenhouse gases". Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. 80 (39): 458–458. Bibcode:1999EOSTr..80..458.. doi:10.1029/99EO00330.
Ledley, Tamara S.; Sundquist, Eric T.; Schwartz, Stephen E.; Hall, Dorothy K.; Fellows, Jack D.; Killeen, Timothy L. (28 September 1999). "Climate change and greenhouse gases". Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. 80 (39): 453–458. Bibcode:1999EOSTr..80Q.453L. doi:10.1029/99EO00325.
"Human-induced climate change requires urgent action" (PDF). American Geophysical Union. August 2013. Retrieved 11 October 2016.
McPhaden, Mike. "We must remain committed to scientific integrity". President's message archive. American Geophysical Union. Retrieved 25 November 2013.
Joyce, Christopher (22 February 2012). "Climate Scientist Admits To Lying, Leaking Documents". npr. Retrieved 25 November 2013.
Gleick, P. H. (20 February 2012). "The Origin of the Heartland Documents". Huffington Post. Retrieved 25 November 2013.
Kaufman, Leslie (March 2, 2012). "Virginia Court Rejects Climate Skeptic's Demand for Records". The New York Times. Retrieved 25 November 2013.
Konkel, Lindsey (Nov 21, 2013). "Climate science lawyers up". Retrieved 25 November 2013.
Making a global impact: 2014 annual report (PDF) (Report). AGU. Retrieved 8 October 2016.
McEntee, Chris (31 August 2015). "AGU Introduces New Organizational Support Policy - From The Prow". From The Prow. American Geophysical Union. Retrieved 8 October 2016.
Frumhoff, Peter C.; Heede, Richard; Oreskes, Naomi (23 July 2015). "The climate responsibilities of industrial carbon producers". Climatic Change. 132 (2): 157–171. Bibcode:2015ClCh..132..157F. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1472-5.
Brulle, Robert J. (21 December 2013). "Institutionalizing delay: foundation funding and the creation of U.S. climate change counter-movement organizations". Climatic Change. 122 (4): 681–694. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-1018-7.
Times Editorial Board. "Exxon's damaging denial on climate change". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 11 October 2016.
Achakulwisut, Ploy; Scandella, Ben; Voss, Britta (6 January 2016). "Why is the largest Earth science conference still sponsored by Exxon?". The Guardian. Retrieved 11 October 2016.
"Scientists to AGU: Drop Exxon Sponsorship". The Natural History Museum. Retrieved 11 October 2016.
Leinen, Margaret (17 March 2016). "UPDATE: Exxon, AGU, and Corporate Support - From The Prow". From The Prow. American Geophysical Union. Retrieved 10 October 2016.
Hirji, Zahra (22 February 2016). "Scientists Urge American Geophysical Union to Cut Ties With Exxon Over Climate Denial". Inside Climate News. Retrieved 10 October 2016.
Leinen, Margaret (14 April 2016). "AGU Board Votes to Continue Relationship with ExxonMobil and to Accept Sponsorship Support - From The Prow". From The Prow. American Geophysical Union. Retrieved 10 October 2016.
Leinen, Margaret (21 February 2016). "Exxon, AGU, and Corporate Support - From The Prow". From The Prow. American Geophysical Union. Retrieved 10 October 2016.
McKenna, Phil; Zahra, Hijri; Song, Lisa (26 May 2016). "Exxon's Donations and Ties to American Geophysical Union Are Larger and Deeper Than Previously Recognized". Inside Climate News. Retrieved 10 October 2016.
Readfern, Graham. ""You Have Been Fooled": AGU Reopens Exxon Sponsorship Review After Stinging Letter From Sen. Whitehouse and Rep. Lieu". DeSmogBlog. Retrieved 11 October 2016.
Frumhoff, Peter. "Why the American Geophysical Union Should Reject Corporate Sponsorship from ExxonMobil - The Equation". blog.ucsusa.org. Retrieved 11 October 2016.
Buhrman, Joan (23 September 2016). "UPDATE: AGU Board Maintains Its Decision Regarding ExxonMobil - From The Prow". From The Prow. American Geophysical Union. Retrieved 10 October 2016.
Further reading Edit
Fleming, J. A. (1954). "Origin and development of the American Geophysical Union, 1919–1952". Transactions, American Geophysical Union. 35 (1): 5. Bibcode:1954TrAGU..35....5F. doi:10.1029/TR035i001p00005. Retrieved 22 November 2013.
Last edited 14 days ago by Bibcode Bot
Wikipedia
Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted.
Terms of UsePrivacyDesktop

User avatar
jliat
Posts: 2772
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: the pyramid: stairway to heaven

Post by jliat » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:32 am

Why?


"The American Geophysical Union is a nonprofit organization of geophysicists, consisting of over 62,000 members from 144 countries. AGU's activities are focused on the organization and dissemination of scientific information in the interdisciplinary and international field of geophysics."

"Geophysics is a subject of natural science concerned with the physical processes and physical properties of the Earth."

Not the sun, planets, cosmology and physics...

killing raven sun
Posts: 1020
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:01 pm

Re: the pyramid: stairway to heaven

Post by killing raven sun » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:43 am

American Geophysical Union
The American Geophysical Union (AGU) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization of geophysicists, consisting of over 62,000 members from 144 countries. AGU's activities are focused on the organization and dissemination of scientific information in the interdisciplinary and international field of geophysics. The geophysical sciences involve four fundamental areas: atmospheric and ocean sciences; solid-Earth sciences; hydrologic sciences; and space sciences.


User avatar
WhiteWarlock
Posts: 1907
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:58 am

Re: the pyramid: stairway to heaven

Post by WhiteWarlock » Mon Sep 17, 2018 9:32 am

James, You only have yourself to blame for your ignorance...
your claims of "debunking" are as weak & flimsy as war crimes testimonies extracted by testicular torture...
in a kangaroo court
you consistently fail comprehending how society actually operates
even whilst fully aware of it dictating your responses
or else your balls will be in the crusher next
keep on "keeping up appearances"
we realize you have no other choice in UK
We are not here for debating with you.

User avatar
jliat
Posts: 2772
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: the pyramid: stairway to heaven

Post by jliat » Mon Sep 17, 2018 10:02 am

WhiteWarlock wrote:
Mon Sep 17, 2018 9:32 am

We are not here for debating with you.
Good -



List of topics characterized as pseudoscience

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_t ... udoscience

- including..

Brainwashing or mind control

Aryanism

Holocaust denial

User avatar
jliat
Posts: 2772
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: the pyramid: stairway to heaven

Post by jliat » Mon Sep 17, 2018 10:18 am

No mention of the Thunderbolts work - refences to standard ideas re light speed relativity etc.

OK Daric - give us the low down on this-
z.jpg
z.jpg (182.93 KiB) Viewed 231 times




https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Electric+Cu ... 1119324492


Part I: Introduction
1 Pioneers of Electric Currents in Geospace 3
Asgeir Brekke
2 Current Systems in Planetary Magnetospheres: A Comparative Overview 17
Krishan K. Khurana and Jiang Liu
3 Electric Currents in the Solar Atmosphere 43
Gregory D. Fleishman and Alexei A. Pevtsov
4 Multipoint Analysis of Electric Currents in Geospace Using the Curlometer Technique 67
M. W. Dunlop, S. Haaland, X‐C. Dong, H. R. Middleton, C. P. Escoubet, Y.-Y. Yang, Q.-H. Zhang, J‐K. Shi, and C. T. Russell
5 Inferring Currents from the Zeeman Effect at the Solar Surface 81
Graham Barnes and K. D. Leka
Part II: Ring Currents
6 ENA Imaging of Planetary Ring Currents 95
P. C. Brandt, S. Y. Hsieh, R. DeMajistre, and D. G. Mitchell
7 Terrestrial Ring Current: A Review of Cluster Results Based on the Curlometer Technique 115
I. Dandouras, S. Rochel‐Grimald, C. Vallat, and M. W. Dunlop
8 The Nature of Jupiter’s Magnetodisk Current System 127
N. Achilleos
9 The Ring Current of Saturn 139
N. Sergis, E. J. Bunce, J. F. Carbary, S. W. H. Cowley, X. Jia, D. C. Hamilton, S. M. Krimigis, D. G. Mitchell, and M. K. Dougherty
Part III: Current Sheets
10 Review on the Characteristics of the Current Sheet in the Earth’s Magnetotail 157
A. T. Y. Lui
11 Recent Advances Regarding the Mars Magnetotail Current Sheet 177
Michael W. Liemohn and Shaosui Xu
12 Current Sheets at the Giant Planets 191
Christopher S. Arridge and Carley J. Martin
13 Planetary Magnetopause and Heliopause Current Sheets 207
E. S. Belenkaya
14 MHS Models of Current Layers in the Solar Atmosphere 219
Clare E. Parnell
15 Large‐Scale Current Sheets in Flares and CMEs 239
Jun Lin and Lei Ni
Part IV: Field‐Aligned Currents
16 A Review of Birkeland Current Research Using AMPERE 259
John C. Coxon, Stephen E. Milan, and Brian J. Anderson
17 Birkeland Currents at Mercury: Review and Comparison With Earth 279
Brian J. Anderson, Catherine L. Johnson, Haje Korth, and Lydia C. Philpott
18 Recent Advances in the Study of Upward Field‐aligned Currents Generated Near the Earth’s Magnetopause Boundary 303
Simon Wing, Jay R. Johnson, and Marius Echim
19 The Current System of Dipolarizing Flux Bundles and Their Role as Wedgelets in the Substorm Current Wedge 323
Jiang Liu, V. Angelopoulos, Zhonghua Yao, Xiangning Chu, Xu‐Zhi Zhou, and A. Runov
20 Cusp Current System: An Energy Source View 339
M. Yamauchi and R. Slapak
21 Magnetospheric and Atmospheric Controls of Giant Planet Auroral Currents 359
L. C. Ray
22 The Ambivalent Role of Field‐Aligned Electric Currents in the Solar Atmosphere 371
Manolis K. Georgoulis
23 Solar Active Region Electric Currents Before and During Eruptive Flares 391
B. Schmieder and G. Aulanier
Part V: Ionospheric Currents
24 Review of Data Analysis Techniques for Estimating Ionospheric Currents Based on MIRACLE and Satellite Observations 409
H. Vanhamäki and L. Juusola
25 Earth’s Ionosphere: Theory and Phenomenology of Cowling Channels 427
Akimasa Yoshikawa and Ryoichi Fujii
26 Ionospheric Currents at Mars and Their Electrodynamic Effects 445
Matthew Fillingim
27 Ionospheric Currents due to Ionosphere‐Magnetosphere Coupling at Jupiter and Saturn 459
G. J. Hunt, S. W. H. Cowley, and J. D. Nichols
Part VI: Other Current Systems
28 The Bow Shock Current System 479
Ramon E. Lopez
29 Current Systems of Inert Moons 497
M. Holmström and S. Fatemi
30 Currents in Cometary Comae 513
Martin Volwerk

killing raven sun
Posts: 1020
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:01 pm

Re: the pyramid: stairway to heaven

Post by killing raven sun » Mon Sep 17, 2018 10:26 am

Image
144ft High Fiberglass Russian Pyramid

All the Russian pyramids are made of fiberglass with the largest is standing an incredible 144 feet high (44 meters) tall, and weighing in at over 55 tons. Built at cost over 1 million dollars this Russian pyramid is a modern wonder.

Many different experiments are being done using these pyramids. They include studies in medicine, ecology, agriculture, physics, and health sciences. What is significant about this work is that it is being carried out by top scientists in Russia and Ukraine and not fringe elements or unknown inventors.

Some of the amazing pyramid power research being done is showing great promise for all mankind.

Brief Summary of Pyramid Research Results

Immune system of organisms improved (blood leukocyte composition increased).
improved regeneration of tissue
seeds stored in the pyramid for 1-5 days showed a 30-100% increase in yield
soon after construction of the Lake Seliger pyramid a marked improvement of the ozone was noted above the area
seismic activity near the pyramid research areas are reduced in severity and size
violent weather also appears to decrease in the vicinity of the pyramids
pyramids constructed in Southern Russia (Bashkiria) appeared to have a positive effect on oil production with oil becoming less viscous by 30% and the yield of the oil wells increased according to tests carried out by the Moscow Academy of Oil and Gas.
a study was done on 5000 prisoners who ingested salt and pepper that had been exposed to the pyramid energy field. The test subjects exhibited a greatly reduced violence rate and overall behavior was much improved.
standard tissue culture tests showed an increase in survival of cellular tissue after infection by viruses and bacteria
radioactive substances show a decreased level of radiation inside the pyramid
there are reports of spontaneous charging of capacitors
physicists observed significant changes in superconductivity temperature thresholds and in the properties of semi-conducting and carbon nano materials.
water inside the pyramid will remain liquid to minus 40 degrees Celsius but freeze instantly if jostled or bumped in any way
It is interesting to note that results seem to show that increasing the height of the pyramid improves the quality of the results.
works just like teslas radiant energy receiver...
Image


Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests