global warming hoax near end

"Don't post anything racist/misogynistic/pornographic, loli images, or any animated GIFs and you should be fine, haha!" The Raytownian

Moderator: xome

User avatar
WhiteWarlock
Posts: 2004
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2018 7:58 am

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by WhiteWarlock » Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:12 pm

Did you remember factoring in little things like solar minimum/maximum CME cycles during your climate change research?

killing raven sun
Posts: 1420
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:01 pm

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by killing raven sun » Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:38 pm

Niallllll wrote:
Wed Dec 12, 2018 11:47 am
you daft cunt. you're refusal or fear of facts don't really mean much to be honest. You're just another dumb fuck in a cloud of dumb fucks.
well at least i know "your" from "you're", so perhaps you've more to learn than you suspect

as for facts, i see you have shown up to the party without any, typical for someone into modelling

at least you have your four letter perjoratives in order

Online
User avatar
clemon
Posts: 4272
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2012 10:21 am
Location: sorry, i get confused :-(

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by clemon » Wed Dec 12, 2018 1:11 pm

hey, daric, what are you into?
*nobody here knows what the fuck you are talking about* adrian:
knew exactly what he was doing. done for no reason. knows who else is involved. doesn't care. won't delete anything. totally unapologetic.

User avatar
Niallllll
Posts: 1163
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 9:31 am
Contact:

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by Niallllll » Wed Dec 12, 2018 4:23 pm

killing raven sun wrote:
Wed Dec 12, 2018 12:38 pm
Niallllll wrote:
Wed Dec 12, 2018 11:47 am
you daft cunt. you're refusal or fear of facts don't really mean much to be honest. You're just another dumb fuck in a cloud of dumb fucks.
well at least i know "your" from "you're", so perhaps you've more to learn than you suspect

as for facts, i see you have shown up to the party without any, typical for someone into modelling

at least you have your four letter perjoratives in order
obvious bait is obvious. And a little boring
As a biologist!

killing raven sun
Posts: 1420
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:01 pm

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by killing raven sun » Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:02 am

For the study, Fasullo and Nerem, both members of the NASA Sea Level Change Team, analyzed the satellite altimetry sea level record, which includes measurements of sea surface heights stretching back to 1993. They mapped global average sea level rise as well as how particular regions deviated from the average.
wow, all the way back to '93, that is quite a stretch :roll:
For example, the oceans surrounding Antarctica and the U.S. West Coast have had lower-than-average sea level rise, while the U.S. East Coast and Southeast Asia, including the Philippines and Indonesia, have experienced the opposite. In some parts of the world, the rate of local sea level rise has been as much as twice the average.

Regional differences in sea level rise are influenced by where heat is stored in the ocean (since warm water expands to fill more space than cold water)
this is so stupid, these idiots think you can "stack" water, its as if they dont understand flow, add tidal influence and they know fuck all
and how that heat is transported around the globe by currents and wind. Uneven sea level rise is also influenced by ice sheets, which lose mass as they melt and shift the gravitational forces affecting regional sea surface height.

Natural shifts in ocean cycles -- including the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, a pattern of sea surface temperatures similar to El Niño but longer lasting -- are therefore known to affect sea levels. So scientists were not surprised to find that as the ocean rises, it rises unevenly. But it's been difficult to say whether these natural cycles were the dominant influence on regional differences.

To investigate the role of climate change, the scientists turned to two sets of climate model runs, known as "large ensembles": one created using the NCAR-based Community Earth System Model and one created using the Earth System Model at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. These large ensembles -- many model simulations by the same model, describing the same time period -- allow researchers to disentangle natural variability from the impacts of climate change. With enough runs, these impacts can be isolated even when they are relatively small compared to the impacts from natural variability.
this is sad, its sad that this passes for science, total egotistical garbage
The climate models suggest that in regions that have seen more or less sea level rise than average, as much as half of that variation may be attributed to climate change. The scientists also found that the impacts from climate change on regional sea level rise sometimes mimic the impacts from natural cycles.
knuckle draggers

User avatar
Niallllll
Posts: 1163
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 9:31 am
Contact:

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by Niallllll » Thu Dec 13, 2018 10:45 am

k
As a biologist!

Online
User avatar
clemon
Posts: 4272
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2012 10:21 am
Location: sorry, i get confused :-(

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by clemon » Thu Dec 13, 2018 10:53 am

leave niall alone daric, no-one's gonna cares how fucking trendy you are when the world ends
*nobody here knows what the fuck you are talking about* adrian:
knew exactly what he was doing. done for no reason. knows who else is involved. doesn't care. won't delete anything. totally unapologetic.

killing raven sun
Posts: 1420
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:01 pm

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by killing raven sun » Thu Dec 13, 2018 12:13 pm

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration may have a boring name, but it has a very important job: It measures U.S. temperatures. Unfortunately, it seems to be a captive of the global warming religion. Its data are fraudulent.

What do we mean by fraudulent? How about this: NOAA has made repeated "adjustments" to its data, for the presumed scientific reason of making the data sets more accurate.

Nothing wrong with that. Except, all their changes point to one thing — lowering previously measured temperatures to show cooler weather in the past, and raising more recent temperatures to show warming in the recent present.

This creates a data illusion of ever-rising temperatures to match the increase in CO2 in the Earth's atmosphere since the mid-1800s, which global warming advocates say is a cause-and-effect relationship. The more CO2, the more warming.

But the actual measured temperature record shows something different: There have been hot years and hot decades since the turn of the last century, and colder years and colder decades. But the overall measured temperature shows no clear trend over the last century, at least not one that suggests runaway warming.

That is, until the NOAA's statisticians "adjust" the data. Using complex statistical models, they change the data to reflect not reality, but their underlying theories of global warming. That's clear from a simple fact of statistics: Data generate random errors, which cancel out over time. So by averaging data, the errors mostly disappear.

That's not what NOAA does.

According to the NOAA, the errors aren't random. They're systematic. As we noted, all of their temperature adjustments lean cooler in the distant past, and warmer in the more recent past. But they're very fuzzy about why this should be.

Far from legitimately "adjusting" anything, it appears they are cooking the data to show a politically correct trend toward global warming. Not by coincidence, that has been part and parcel of the government's underlying policies for the better part of two decades.

What NOAA does aren't niggling little changes, either.

As Tony Heller at the Real Climate Science web site notes, "Pre-2000 temperatures are progressively cooled, and post-2000 temperatures are warmed. This year has been a particularly spectacular episode of data tampering by NOAA, as they introduce nearly 2.5 degrees of fake warming since 1895."

So the global warming scare is basically a hoax.

This winter, for instance, as measured by temperature in city after city and by snow-storm severity, has been one of the coldest on record in the Northeast.

But after the NOAA's wizards finished with the data, it was merely about average.

Climate analyst Paul Homewood notes for instance that in New York state, measured temperatures this year were 2.7 degrees or more colder than in 1943. Not to NOAA. Its data show temperatures this year as 0.9 degrees cooler than the actual data in 1943.

Erasing Winter

By the way, a similar result occurred after the brutally cold 2013-2014 winter in New York. It was simply adjusted away. Do this year after year, and with the goal of radically altering the temperature record to fit the global warming narrative, and you have what amounts to climate fraud.

"Clearly NOAA's highly homogenized and adjusted version of the Central Lakes temperature record bears no resemblance at all the the actual station data," writes Homewood. "And if this one division is so badly in error, what confidence can there be that the rest of the U.S. is any better?"

That's the big question. And for those who think that government officials don't have political, cultural or other agendas, that's naivete of the highest sort. They do.

Since the official government mantra for all of the bureaucracies at least since the Clinton era is that CO2 production is an evil that inevitably leads to runaway global warming, those who toil in the bureaucracies' statistical sweat shops know that their careers and future funding depend on having the politically correct answers — not the scientifically correct ones.

"The key point here is that while NOAA frequently makes these adjustments to the raw data, it has never offered a convincing explanation as to why they are necessary," wrote James Delingpole recently in Breitbart's Big Government. "Nor yet, how exactly their adjusted data provides a more accurate version of the truth than the original data."

There are at least some signs of progress, however. In the case of the Environmental Protection Agency, future reports and studies will include the data and the underlying scientific assumptions for public scrutiny.

That's one way to bring greater honesty to government — and to keep climate charlatans from bankrupting our nation with spurious demands for carbon taxes and deindustrialization of our economy to prevent global warming. The only real result won't be a cooler planet, but rather mass poverty and lower standards of living for all.

User avatar
Niallllll
Posts: 1163
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 9:31 am
Contact:

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by Niallllll » Thu Dec 13, 2018 3:26 pm

tards gonna tard
As a biologist!

Online
User avatar
clemon
Posts: 4272
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2012 10:21 am
Location: sorry, i get confused :-(

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by clemon » Thu Dec 13, 2018 4:00 pm

shut the fuck up about being schizoptypal and diagnosed with ptsd literally, no-one cares at all
*nobody here knows what the fuck you are talking about* adrian:
knew exactly what he was doing. done for no reason. knows who else is involved. doesn't care. won't delete anything. totally unapologetic.

Online
User avatar
clemon
Posts: 4272
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2012 10:21 am
Location: sorry, i get confused :-(

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by clemon » Thu Dec 13, 2018 4:03 pm

awkward people have awkward beliefs, probably cos they's so fucking stupid, tbh !!!
*nobody here knows what the fuck you are talking about* adrian:
knew exactly what he was doing. done for no reason. knows who else is involved. doesn't care. won't delete anything. totally unapologetic.

killing raven sun
Posts: 1420
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:01 pm

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by killing raven sun » Thu Dec 13, 2018 5:35 pm

Niallllll wrote:
Thu Dec 13, 2018 3:26 pm
tards gonna tard
hey, dont get me wrong, just like the military climate change grants keep the dangerously stupid occupied, im happy it worked out for you :D


killing raven sun
Posts: 1420
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:01 pm

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by killing raven sun » Fri Dec 14, 2018 4:51 am

Screenshot_2018-12-14-04-48-13.jpg
Screenshot_2018-12-14-04-48-13.jpg (94.74 KiB) Viewed 506 times

User avatar
jliat
Posts: 2978
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 1:34 am
Contact:

Re: global warming hoax near end

Post by jliat » Fri Dec 14, 2018 5:38 am

Frontiers of Freedom receives money of tobacco and oil companies, including Philip Morris Co, ExxonMobil and RJ Reynolds Tobacco... In 2003, Exxon gave FoF $195,000, $250,000 in 2004, $140,000 in 2005 and $180,000 in 2006...Climate Change - FoF describes itself as an “international leader in combating the proliferation of politicized and sensationalized “science” about global climate change”. Leading opponent of the Kyoto Protocol and a member of the Cooler Heads Coalition...George Landrith, President of FoF told the New York Times: “They've determined that we are effective at what we do”, He said Exxon essentially took the attitude, “We like to make it possible to do more of that"

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: clemon and 10 guests