fire wrote: ↑
Thu Feb 15, 2018 9:59 am
jliat wrote: ↑
Thu Feb 15, 2018 8:09 am
The simple fact is you used a scientist who is working on dark matter to provide a criteria for your critique. Nothing to do with the actual topic just your failure to see (deliberate or not) the stupidity in doing so.
I dont have to try, you simply do it yourself, foot shooting.
hilarious, if you think dark matter theory isnt related to the universe or astrology or even medical science then you arent even at entry level understanding of anything. your books have failed you
You seem to fail to understand my point which is nothing to do with the topic but your line of argument. And is nothing to do with 'books' or youtube- your source of wisdom.
1. This work (A) is wrong and the justification methodology for it is false.
2. This other work (B) is wrong, but can be corrected by using the justification methods in 1.
As before you have contradicted yourself. What you lack is not to be gained from youtube or books or insights in your head but the ability to follow an argument with someone who points out a contradiction.
What you need is to talk and discuss with real people whose ideas are not your own and listen to the way in which a case can be made. And try to form an argument which does not contradict itself. Wrapping up your ideas in goo goo mysticism and attacking the intelligence of others is not going to work- for anyone other than a delusional person. Thats why no one save me takes you seriously here...