........
Moderator: xome
DERP, DATS WHUT I THAUGHT
TOO BAD YOU CANT BACK UP YOUR BLUFF
MAYBE YOU IGNORE AMOSES SHOULD THINK
BEFORE POSTING YOUR REGURGITATION
MAYBE IF YOU KNEW WHAT YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT
YOU COULD EXPLAIN HOW IM WRONG
OR CONVERSELY, YOU WOULD KNOW IM RIGHT
TRY TO KEEP UP OR GET OUT OF THE WAY
TOO BAD YOU CANT BACK UP YOUR BLUFF
MAYBE YOU IGNORE AMOSES SHOULD THINK
BEFORE POSTING YOUR REGURGITATION
MAYBE IF YOU KNEW WHAT YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT
YOU COULD EXPLAIN HOW IM WRONG
OR CONVERSELY, YOU WOULD KNOW IM RIGHT
TRY TO KEEP UP OR GET OUT OF THE WAY
broadcasting from the post-internet wasteland
- crochambeau
- Posts: 2706
- Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 12:48 pm
- Location: earth.
- Contact:
fire wrote:NONE, I GOTS ALL MY DAIN BRAMAGE AS A KID

Thanks for the laugh, it was most helpful. Regretfully I have nothing more to contribute to the topic at hand.
*ckrsssssght*
http://www.rochambeau.net/
http://www.rochambeau.net/
- crochambeau
- Posts: 2706
- Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 12:48 pm
- Location: earth.
- Contact:
Forgive me, I love looking at Ralph.
Okay, TO RECAP:
The backbone of your position is that climate change does not exist because it cannot exist in the face of an unchanging system, therefore humans are incapable of making any impact whatsoever in terms of what passes for temperatures these days.
Your suggestion is that we should therefore defer attention away from sources of atmospheric pollution because there is a more pressing concern on both the food chain/cycle of life (Triclosan) and of uncontrolled emitters of energy diffusing into the ecosystem (radionuclides from Fukushima).
I'm not convinced in regards to your position that climate is an impact free non-issue, nor am I convinced that the way in which you reach these conclusions reflects sound thinking. BUT, as stated, I'm sort of done with that debate.
............which brings us around to the two items you escalated with. It would appear to me as if there is no handle on which to mitigate these issues, so for all intents and purposes it amounts to doom saying. Am I supposed to kowtow to the imperative nature of these things and simply bask in helplessness or did you offer up a direction through which these threats might be resolved and I just missed it through pre-filtering your words because you use terms like "libtard" etc.
Okay, this is the solution. Move toward the light at the center of the galaxy, away from the dark space?fire wrote:you must purify and emmigrate individually to the promised land, good luck
In terms of grinding dimensional realms, I seriously fail to comprehend how bird dogging climate change and/or embracing argument is beneficial to this cause of yours.
This all sort of feels like a "who needs science when we have scientology?" (or any other belief shrouded discourse) moment to me. So instead of maintaining discourse I'll revert to what I know.
PS, I have a hunch anyone making it to the center of the galaxy has already paved their course, and doing the missionary service is just inviting elements of the disease along for the ride.
*ckrsssssght*
http://www.rochambeau.net/
http://www.rochambeau.net/

climate does change, that much is obvious, the parameters are sorely understood and important ones are discounted, like the suncrochambeau wrote:The backbone of your position is that climate change does not exist because it cannot exist in the face of an unchanging system, therefore humans are incapable of making any impact whatsoever in terms of what passes for temperatures these days.
can man alter the climate? sure, if you want to get all star trek on its ass
are we doing it haphazardly? not yet, but we might someday
that would be a good start, at this point we are sprinting toward a dead planet, everyone just seems to want to run faster, there is no way AGW(if real) can compete with ecocidecrochambeau wrote:Your suggestion is that we should therefore defer attention away from sources of atmospheric pollution because there is a more pressing concern on both the food chain/cycle of life (Triclosan) and of uncontrolled emitters of energy diffusing into the ecosystem (radionuclides from Fukushima).
the changing climate is real, we didnt instigate the changes and are ill prepared to do anything about it except adaptcrochambeau wrote:I'm not convinced in regards to your position that climate is an impact free non-issue
you play here, you pay herecrochambeau wrote:Am I supposed to kowtow to the imperative nature of these things and simply bask in helplessness or did you offer up a direction through which these threats might be resolved
its too late to save her unless we all wake up to our dilemma, dont count on that
fire wrote:you must purify and emmigrate individually to the promised land, good luck
well, you could go anywhere in the universe, i just suggest an easier move first time you do it consciously, since we are all most familiar with the local galaxy, of course you are free to stay here and see what happens, most people will, they are in love with this planet, their hearts are ill with it, and for good reason when it was a paradise, but now our global social issues reflect the health of the planet, a messcrochambeau wrote:Okay, this is the solution. Move toward the light at the center of the galaxy, away from the dark space?
its a main symptom of mans unwillingness to understand his connection to the universe, by disassociation with his local environscrochambeau wrote:In terms of grinding dimensional realms, I seriously fail to comprehend how bird dogging climate change and/or embracing argument is beneficial to this cause of yours.
if there are no truths in science, how is it different than religion?crochambeau wrote:This all sort of feels like a "who needs science when we have scientology?" (or any other belief shrouded discourse) moment to me. So instead of maintaining discourse I'll revert to what I know.
this whole science>religion thing is just posturing
at this very moment scientists are being confronted in the lab with conscious energy not of their own, a higher consciousness they are finding(entanglement)
hmm, curious comment, do you consider youself to be refuse? maybe you think its too late to leave?crochambeau wrote:PS, I have a hunch anyone making it to the center of the galaxy has already paved their course, and doing the missionary service is just inviting elements of the disease along for the ride.
the very act of preparing yourself to be a "citizen of the universe"(life+learning) is purifying, and i am not talking about living up to some dogma, each individual must develop their own understanding of right and wrong, to be their own god, religion and worshipper
hold on, i didnt say each of us gets to decide what is right and wrong, there is a well worn framework lurking in the Mind, disused by many but still active, some refer to it as "intuition" and when cultivated will help you literally see which way the energy flows
broadcasting from the post-internet wasteland
- crochambeau
- Posts: 2706
- Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 12:48 pm
- Location: earth.
- Contact:
In my opinion religion supposes an unproven truth as a basis for reality the questioning of which is discouraged by the adherents, whereas science has established a set of criteria against which everything is questioned.fire wrote:if there are no truths in science, how is it different than religion?
YES - I REALIZE THERE'S A LOOPHOLE NESTED IN THAT STATEMENT.
All this bandying about is framed in human artifice anyway.
No, I acknowledge my own set of perceptions and threads in the bigger picture that support a lateral drift of the magnitude that you describe... but once we're talking on this magnitude of existence stuff like "hurry" is no longer relevant, so the urgency nested within the argument seems odd to me.fire wrote:curious comment, do you consider youself to be refuse?
Based on that recent set of replies, I surmise there have either been numerous communication disconnects between my comprehension of your definitions and your comprehension of mine, or that your position contains interference grade inconsistencies.
I'm leaning on the former as to be quite honest my attention span runs a pretty shallow spar with scanning the boards and general internet caliber interaction.
Good thread, you're still goofy as fuck all with more presentation angst than is helpful, but hey, who isn't?
*ckrsssssght*
http://www.rochambeau.net/
http://www.rochambeau.net/
In my opinion AGW supposes an unproven truth as a basis for reality the questioning of which is discouraged by the adherentscrochambeau wrote:In my opinion religion supposes an unproven truth as a basis for reality the questioning of which is discouraged by the adherentsfire wrote:if there are no truths in science, how is it different than religion?
unless the "science is settled"crochambeau wrote:whereas science has established a set of criteria against which everything is questioned
indeed, with nowhere to go, whats the hurry? i guess you believe in one and youre done, i do not, in fact i know we are forever and as such i advocate for spending time among the living instead of embracing the darkness of our current pathcrochambeau wrote:once we're talking on this magnitude of existence stuff like "hurry" is no longer relevant, so the urgency nested within the argument seems odd to me.
thanks for playing alongcrochambeau wrote:Good thread, you're still goofy as fuck all with more presentation angst than is helpful, but hey, who isn't?
broadcasting from the post-internet wasteland
Re:
what is dark discharge mode?fire wrote: anyway, the sun will go into dark discharge mode within a couple hundred years which will be the end for sure, this is because we are drifting away from our Birkeland current filament that powers the sun, nothing rotating this close to dark space lasts long, we are being cast into the abyss, that is why we must move into the light(a planet closer to the galactic center), but for obvious reasons we cannot just migrate our mass of ignorance, you must purify and emmigrate individually to the promised land, good luck
how does one get to the promised land?
Re: Re:
https://books.google.com/books?id=wRlDA ... de&f=falsezombra wrote: ↑Sun Mar 19, 2017 7:38 amwhat is dark discharge mode?fire wrote: anyway, the sun will go into dark discharge mode within a couple hundred years which will be the end for sure, this is because we are drifting away from our Birkeland current filament that powers the sun, nothing rotating this close to dark space lasts long, we are being cast into the abyss, that is why we must move into the light(a planet closer to the galactic center), but for obvious reasons we cannot just migrate our mass of ignorance, you must purify and emmigrate individually to the promised land, good luck

Re: Re:
when the sun goes darkzombra wrote: ↑Sun Mar 19, 2017 7:38 amwhat is dark discharge mode?fire wrote: anyway, the sun will go into dark discharge mode within a couple hundred years which will be the end for sure, this is because we are drifting away from our Birkeland current filament that powers the sun, nothing rotating this close to dark space lasts long, we are being cast into the abyss, that is why we must move into the light(a planet closer to the galactic center), but for obvious reasons we cannot just migrate our mass of ignorance, you must purify and emmigrate individually to the promised land, good luck
how does one get to the promised land?
it will die with a soft red glow
diffusing into a softer purple glow
which expands ever larger
as the liquid metal hydrogen
begins to boil off
the promised land is wherever you go, most of us come back here, our heart is here, in this planet, we all know each other, its familiar, even if we fight, its normal, we love it
when the sun goes out, there will be many souls still not willing to leave, they will cling to the dead earth, as crystals or minerals, eventually to be dispersed across dark space, the abyss, slowly becoming the low end of the trough, the sub atomic
others will leave for a new heavens and a new earth, many already have, all through the ages, many travellers have gone many places, and yes, the over zealous sometimes speed their process up with suicide cults, because the sun cant die soon enough for them, and a dead comet is some solace, but, far more have tuned into a far off energy, one they have learned about from a master, a spirit guide, telling them about heaven or paradise, some perfection, this draws the student forward
it is life and death, everyone chooses
i advocate life, its where everything is most complex, most interesting, most of us are still recovering from being particles and are just barely alive as it is, still so much to learn and enjoy in our short time
avoid the worldwide death cult
the sun is the provider of all complexity here, it is the best master to learn from, form a personal cult between you and the sun
broadcasting from the post-internet wasteland
Re: ........
when's the sun getting its dark discharge on?
if i'm culting it up with the sun, will i last until it goes out? will i be able to move on afterwards? is there a point when pupil turns master (i become sun)?
if i'm culting it up with the sun, will i last until it goes out? will i be able to move on afterwards? is there a point when pupil turns master (i become sun)?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests